Bridging the divide between families and health professionals’ perspectives on family‐centred care
Open accessAbstract
Objectives To describe and discuss key findings from a recent research project that challenge an increasingly prevalent theme, apparent in both family‐centred care research and practice, of conceptualizing family‐centred care as shifting care, care management, and advocacy responsibilities to families. The purpose of the research, from which these findings emerged, was to develop a conceptualization of family‐centred care grounded in the experiences of families and direct health‐care providers. Design Qualitative research methods, following the grounded theory tradition, were used to develop a conceptual framework that described the dimensions of the concept of family‐centred care and their interrelationships, in the substantive area of children's developmental services. This article reports on and extends key findings from this grounded theory study, in light of current trends in the literature. Setting and participants The substantive area that served as the setting for the research was developmental services at a children's hospital in Alberta, Canada. Data was collected through focus groups and individual interviews with 37 parents of children diagnosed with a developmental problem and 16 frontline health‐care providers. Findings Key findings from this research project do not support the current emphasis in family‐centred care research and practice on conceptualizing family‐centred care as the shifting of care, care management, and advocacy responsibilities to families. Rather, what emerged was that parents want to work truly collaboratively with health‐care providers in making treatment decisions and on implementing a dynamic care plan that will work best for child and family. Discussion and conclusions A definition of collaboration is provided, and the nature of collaborative relationships described. Contributing factors to the difficulty in establishing true collaborative relationships between families and health‐care professionals, where the respective roles to be played by health‐care professionals and families are jointly determined, are discussed. In light of these findings we strongly advocate for the re‐examination of current family‐centred care policy and practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Families of children with chronic or complex conditions report multiple unmet needs on information and physician collaboration, specifically on community services, condition understanding, and networking.
“Families of children with chronic or complex conditions report multiple unmet needs on information and physician collaboration [9, 10], specifically on community services, condition understanding, and networking [63, 64].”
From Family-Centered Care: Current Applications and Future Directions in Pediatric Health Care (2012) · cites this paper as [9]
Some providers consider FCC as delegating more responsibility to families for care and decision making than families desire.
“Some providers consider FCC as delegating more responsibility to families for care and decision making than families desire [9, 10].”
From Family-Centered Care: Current Applications and Future Directions in Pediatric Health Care (2012) · cites this paper as [9]
Parents consistently rate high levels of satisfaction with a sense of partnership in a variety of child health care settings, even as subjective descriptions of care are far less satisfactory.
“Parents consistently rate high levels of satisfaction with a sense of partnership in a variety of child health care settings [76–78], even as subjective descriptions of care are far less satisfactory [9, 10].”
From Family-Centered Care: Current Applications and Future Directions in Pediatric Health Care (2012) · cites this paper as [9]
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449 · see citing works
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,636 · see citing works
Evaluating family‐centred service using a measure of parents’ perceptions
King, G. A., Rosenbaum, P. L., & King, S. M. (1997) · Child: Care, Health and Development · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2214.1997.840840.x · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Leiter, V. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00258-2 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Family-Centered Care: Current Applications and Future Directions in Pediatric Health Care
Kuo, D. Z., Houtrow, A. J., Arango, P., Kuhlthau, K. A., Simmons, J. M., & Neff, J. M. (2012) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-011-0751-7 · Cited by 943 · see citing works
Baumbusch, J., Mayer, S., & Sloan‐Yip, I. (2019) · Journal of Genetic Counseling · doi:10.1007/s10897-018-0294-9 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Kuo, D. Z., Bird, T. M., & Tilford, J. M. (2011) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10995-010-0648-x · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Care coordination between medical and early intervention services: family and provider perspectives
O'Neil, M. E., Ideishi, R. I., Nixon-Cave, K., & Kohrt, A. (2008) · Families, Systems, & Health · doi:10.1037/1091-7527.26.2.119 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- MacKean, G. L., Thurston, W. E., & Scott, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Venue
- Health Expectations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-15
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-85
- ISSN
- 1369-6513 (ISSN-L)
- 1369-7625
- PMC
- PMC5060268
- OpenAlex
- W2149571138
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 24.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Health Expectations (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
- Keywords
- family-centered care, children's hospitals, care management, patient advocacy, parents of children with developmental disabilities, health care provider role
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Alberta, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Family, Health Personnel, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Focus Groups, Patient-Centered Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review