The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neurocognitive impairment in bipolar disorder patients: functional implications
Open accessAbstract
Background: Functional recovery among treated bipolar disorder (BPD) patients is far less likely than syndromal and even symptomatic recovery. We hypothesized that increasingly well‐documented aspects of cognitive impairment may contribute to poor functional outcomes in BPD patients, and reviewed the available research on the topic. Methods: Computerized literature searching identified 12 studies with 13 comparisons that simultaneously evaluated cognitive and functional status in euthymic (n = 8) or non‐euthymic (n = 5 comparisons) adult BPD patients versus otherwise similar healthy controls. Results: In 6/8 studies of euthymic BPD patients and 5/5 studies of non‐euthymic BPD patients, neurocognitive impairment was significantly associated with impaired psychosocial functioning, even after adjusting for residual mood symptoms and relevant demographic and clinical variables. Cognitive status was consistently assessed with standardized, performance‐based neuropsychological tests, but functional status usually was based on subjective self‐appraisals. Approximately 55% of BPD patients were unemployed. Conclusions: Available studies are limited by subjective assessments of functional status rather than objective, performance‐based measures. Nevertheless, they support the hypothesis that enduring aspects of cognitive impairment found even in euthymic BPD patients are associated with inferior functioning. These findings encourage further studies with better assessment methods and greater rehabilitative efforts in BPD patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(2010) · Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-78665-0_5485 · Cited by 10,169
A Rating Scale for Mania: Reliability, Validity and Sensitivity
Young, R. C., Biggs, J. T., Ziegler, V. E., & Meyer, D. A. (1978) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.133.5.429 · Cited by 8,744
Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness
HAMILTON, M. (1967) · British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x · Cited by 8,410
Validity of the Trail Making Test as an Indicator of Organic Brain Damage
Reitan, R. M. (1958) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1958.8.3.271 · Cited by 7,928
The Neuropsychological Assessment
Ogden, J. A. (2005) · Fractured Minds · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195171358.003.0002 · Cited by 4,364
L’examen Clinique en Psychologie
Rubé, P. (1959) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1959.13.4.989 · Cited by 3,302
Green, M. F., Kern, R. S., Braff, D. L., & Mintz, J. (2000) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033430 · Cited by 2,999
Randolph, C., Tierney, M. C., Mohr, E., & Chase, T. N. (1998) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1076/jcen.20.3.310.823 · Cited by 2,519
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity
Nuechterlein, K. H., Green, M. F., Kern, R. S., Baade, L. E., Barch, D. M., Cohen, J. D., Essock, S., Fenton, W. S., Frese, F. J., Gold, J. M., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07010042 · Cited by 2,342
The Long-term Natural History of the Weekly Symptomatic Status of Bipolar I Disorder
Judd, L. L., Akiskal, H. S., Schettler, P. J., Endicott, J., Maser, J., Solomon, D. A., Leon, A. C., Rice, J. A., & Keller, M. B. (2002) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.59.6.530 · Cited by 2,106
Cited by
The effects of child abuse and neglect on cognitive functioning in adulthood
Gould, F., Clarke, J., Heim, C., Harvey, P. D., Majer, M., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2012) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.01.005 · Cited by 367
Self-citationCotrena, C., Branco, L. D., Shansis, F. M., & Fonseca, R. P. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.007 · Cited by 227
Subthreshold symptoms in bipolar disorder: Impact on neurocognition, quality of life and disability
Bonnín, C. M., Sánchez-Moreno, J., Martínez-Arán, A., Solé, B., Reinares, M., Rosa, A. R., Goikolea, J. M., Benabarre, A., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., Ferrer, M., et al. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.012 · Cited by 190
Evans, V. C., Iverson, G. L., Yatham, L. N., & Lam, R. W. (2014) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.13r08939 · Cited by 185
Mora, E., Portella, M. J., Forcada, I., Vieta, E., & Mur, M. (2013) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291712001948 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Wingo, A. P., Harvey, P. D., & Baldessarini, R. J.
- Venue
- Bipolar Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02-25
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-125
- ISSN
- 1398-5647 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-5618
- OpenAlex
- W1980163556
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 83
- FWCI
- 13.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurocognitive impairment in bipolar disorder patients: functional implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00665.x
- The paper
- Wingo, A. P., Harvey, P. D., & Baldessarini, R. J. (2009). Neurocognitive impairment in bipolar disorder patients: functional implications. Bipolar Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00665.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.