Cited by 227Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Executive function impairments in depression and bipolar disorder: association with functional impairment and quality of life

Cotrena, Charles, Branco, Laura Damiani, Shansis, Flávio Milman, Fonseca, Rochele Paz·2016·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background The neuropsychological correlates of major depressive (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD), and their association with quality of life (QOL) and functioning, have not been sufficiently studied in the literature. The present study aimed to compare executive functions, attention, processing speed, QOL and disability between patients with BD type I, BD type II, MDD and healthy controls.Method 205 participants (n=37 BDI, 81% female; n=35 BDII, 80% female; n=45 MDD, 69% female; n=89C, 46% female) aged between 18 and 67 years were administered an extensive neurocognitive battery consisting of widely used standardized measures such as the Trail Making Test, the Stroop Color-Word Test and a modified version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task. Z-scores were compared between groups by ANCOVA. The prevalence of impairments on each measure (Z-score<1.5) was compared between groups using chi-square tests. The associations between cognition, quality of life and functioning were evaluated through correlational analysis.Results Patients with MDD showed poor selective and sustained attention, and exhibited impairments in timed tasks, suggesting low efficiency of executive processing. Patients with BDI displayed more widespread cognitive impairment than the remaining groups, and performed worse than subjects with MDD on measures of sustained attention and inhibitory control. Decision-making ability and attentional control were able to distinguish between patients with BDI and BDII. QOL and disability were most impaired in patients with BDI, and more closely associated with cognitive impairment than in the remaining groups.Limitations No control of pharmacological variables, clinical or demographic characteristics.Conclusions Our results provide important information regarding the nature and severity of the cognitive alterations associated with different mood disorders, and may contribute to the diagnosis, rehabilitation and treatment of these conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.007

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recurrently depressed individuals have impaired cognitive functioning and diminished cognitive resources.

    “Recurrently depressed individuals’ vulnerability to depressogenic cognition is additionally exacerbated by impaired cognitive functioning and diminished cognitive resources.”

    From Mindfulness-Based Interventions in Psychiatry (2018) · cites this paper as [67]

  • These individuals often show overgeneral autobiographical memory, impaired attention regulation, and difficulty suppressing competing or irrelevant thoughts and mental sets.

    “These individuals often exhibit overgeneral autobiographical memory (i.e. a difficulty in retrieving specific personal events), impairments in attention regulation, and difficulties suppressing competing or currently-irrelevant thoughts and mental sets, among other cognitive deficits (62–68).”

    From Mindfulness-Based Interventions in Psychiatry (2018) · cites this paper as [67]

  • Attention impairments in major depressive disorder negatively impact daily function and are associated with poorer clinical outcome.

    “Attention impairments in particular are known to negatively impact daily function3,4 and are associated with poorer clinical outcome5.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [4]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cotrena, C., Branco, L. D., Shansis, F. M., & Fonseca, R. P.
Affiliations
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Corresponding author
Cotrena, Charles
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
190
Pages
744-753
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2177357938
Cited by
227
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14
FWCI
15.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
executive function, major depressive disorder, bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder, quality of life, functional disability, cognitive impairment, attention, processing speed, inhibitory control, decision-making, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Stroop task, Trail Making Test
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attention, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Quality of Life, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review