Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in adults

Apfel, C. C., Greim, C. A., Haubitz, I., Goepfert, C., Usadel, J., Sefrin, P., Roewer, N.·1998·Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to identify factors most relevant for postoperative vomiting (PV) and to develop a risk score to predict the probability of PV. Methods: Adult inpatients scheduled for elective ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery under general anaesthesia were offered to participate in a prospective study for PV over 24 h. No prophylactic antiemetics were used. The data of 1137 patients were randomized and split into an evaluation set (n=553) and a validation set (n=584). The evaluation set was subjected to logistic regression analysis to quantify the relative impact of anaesthetic, surgical and individual factors and to develop a risk score. The score was then tested by applying it to the validation set. The area under a receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated and the predicted and actual incidences of patients were correlated. Results: In the evaluation set, patient‐related factors (female gender, young age, non‐smoking, history of PV or motion sickness) and a high duration of anaesthesia were independent risk factors for PV. The probability of PV could be estimated from the equation: PV = 1/(1 + exp(‐z)) where z=1.28 · (gender)‐0.029· (age)‐0.74·(smoking)+0.63·(history of PV or motion sickness)+0.26 · (duration)‐0.92. In the validation set this score achieved an area under the ROC‐curve of 0.78 and the actual incidence correlated strongly with the predicted risks (R 2=0.93, P<0.001). Conclusion: The data suggest that the probability of PV following ENT surgery under inhalational anaesthesia with low‐dose opioids can be predicted by a score mainly based upon patient‐related risk factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05157.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Apfel, C. C., Greim, C. A., Haubitz, I., Goepfert, C., Usadel, J., Sefrin, P., & Roewer, N.
Venue
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-05
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
495-501
ISSN
  • 0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-6576
OpenAlex
W1977121588
Cited by
306
References
14
FWCI
14.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05157.x
The paper
Apfel, C. C., Greim, C. A., Haubitz, I., Goepfert, C., Usadel, J., Sefrin, P., & Roewer, N. (1998). A risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in adults. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05157.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.