Cited by 161DNA Repair MechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

Post‐Replication Repair of DNA in Ultraviolet‐Irradiated Mammalian Cells: No Gaps in DNA Synthesized Late after Ultraviolet Irradiation

Lehmann, Alan R., Kirk‐Bell, Susan·1972·European Journal of Biochemistry

Abstract

Ultraviolet light produces pyrimidine dimers in cellular DNA. In mouse cell lines the great majority of these pyrimidine dimers are not excised, but remain in high molecular weight DNA. Hence the DNA used as template for DNA synthesis in the first generation after ultraviolet irradiation must contain such dimers. In two mouse cell lines (L5178Y and 3T3), alkaline sucrose sedimentation studies showed that the DNA pulse‐labelled shortly after irradiation contained gaps, which by analogy with the situation in Escherichia coli, are presumed to be opposite the pyrimidine dimers. In contrast such gaps could not be detected in DNA pulse‐labelled several hours after irradiation, despite the fact that dimers must have been present on the template strands. A possible explanation is that gaps were still being formed, but were filled in rapidly and were therefore not detected. This hypothesis was tested as follows. Either 1 or 8 h after ultraviolet irradiation cells were pulse‐labelled in the presence of theophylline. This purine inhibits the filling in of gaps presumably by binding to the DNA in the gap. Even in the presence of theophylline, the late‐synthesized DNA was considerably larger than the early‐synthesized DNA. This suggests that at late times after irradiation, gaps were either not formed at all opposite the dimers, or were so transient that theophylline could not bind and inhibit their filling in. A model for synthesis of DNA on templates containing pyrimidine dimers in mammalian cells, based on these findings and other recent results, is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1972.tb02550.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Blocked polymerases can leave the lesion and PCNA behind and re-initiate downstream via re-priming, generating numerous ssDNA gaps behind forks that likely cause strong Mec1 activation during S phase in UV-irradiated cells.

    “Blocked polymerase can leave the lesion and PCNA behind and re-initiate downstream of the lesion via a re-priming mechanism, generating numerous ssDNA gaps behind the forks, which are likely responsible for the strong activation of Mec1 during S phase in UV-irradiated cells [51,82–85].”

    From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [83]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehmann, A. R., & Kirk‐Bell, S.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Venue
European Journal of Biochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1972-12
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
438-445
ISSN
  • 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1033
OpenAlex
W1984436184
Cited by
161
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
postreplication repair, UV irradiation, pyrimidine dimers, DNA replication, gap filling, theophylline, L5178Y cells, 3T3 fibroblasts, DNA synthesis, mammalian cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Carbon Isotopes, Cell Line, Centrifugation, Density Gradient, DNA, DNA Repair, DNA Replication, Lymphoma, Models, Biological, Molecular Weight, Pyrimidine Nucleotides, Theophylline, Thymidine, Time Factors, Tritium, Ultraviolet Rays, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review