Cited by 38Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAgricultural safety and regulations

ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Effects of long-term feeding of genetically modified corn (event MON810) on the performance of lactating dairy cows: Long-term feeding of genetically modified corn in dairy cows

Steinke, K., Guertler, P., Paul, V., Wiedemann, S., Ettle, T., Albrecht, C., Meyer, H. H. D., Spiekers, H. +1 more·2010·Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition

Abstract

A long-term study over 25 months was conducted to evaluate the effects of genetically modified corn on performance of lactating dairy cows. Thirty-six dairy cows were assigned to two feeding groups and fed with diets based on whole-crop silage, kernels and whole-crop cobs from Bt-corn (Bt-MON810) or its isogenic not genetically modified counterpart (CON) as main components. The study included two consecutive lactations. There were no differences in the chemical composition and estimated net energy content of Bt-MON810 and CON corn components and diets. CON feed samples were negative for the presence of Cry1Ab protein, while in Bt-MON810 feed samples the Cry1Ab protein was detected. Cows fed Bt-MON810 corn had a daily Cry1Ab protein intake of 6.0 mg in the first lactation and 6.1 mg in the second lactation of the trial. Dry matter intake (DMI) was 18.8 and 20.7 kg/cow per day in the first and the second lactation of the trial, with no treatment differences. Similarly, milk yield (23.8 and 29.0 kg/cow per day in the first and the second lactation of the trial) was not affected by dietary treatment. There were no consistent effects of feeding MON810 or its isogenic CON on milk composition or body condition. Thus, the present long-term study demonstrated the compositional and nutritional equivalence of Bt-MON810 and its isogenic CON.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01003.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinke, K., Guertler, P., Paul, V., Wiedemann, S., Ettle, T., Albrecht, C., Meyer, H. H. D., Spiekers, H., & Schwarz, F. J.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture (DE)
Corresponding author
Schwarz, F. J.
Venue
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-22
Volume
94
Issue
5
Pages
e185-e193
ISSN
0931-2439 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1841373253
Cited by
38
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
Keywords
transgenic maize, lactating dairy cows, Cry1Ab toxin, whole crop silage, feed safety, milk yield, dry matter intake, milk composition, body condition, nutritional equivalence, long-term feeding
MeSH terms
Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins, Animals, Animal Feed, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Bacterial Proteins, Cattle, Zea mays, Diet, Endotoxins, Fats, Female, Hemolysin Proteins, Lactation, Milk, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review