Cited by 86Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchRisk Perception and ManagementAgricultural safety and regulations

How safe does transgenic food need to be?

DeFrancesco, Laura·2013·Nature Biotechnology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.2686

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeFrancesco, L.
Corresponding author
DeFrancesco, Laura
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2013-09
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
794-802
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W1967446674
Cited by
86
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2013-12-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
Keywords
transgenic foods, food safety assessment, genetically modified crops, public perception, risk assessment, food safety regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Biotechnology, Humans, Swine, Plants, Genetically Modified, Food, Genetically Modified, Biomedical Research, Mice, Rats, Food Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review