Cited by 89Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseSports Performance and Training

Cardiovascular adaptations in rats submitted to a resistance-training model

Barauna, Valerio G, Junior, Miguel Luis B, Costa Rosa, Luis Fernando BP, Casarini, Dulce E, Krieger, José Eduardo, Oliveira, Edilamar M·2005·Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology

Abstract

1. The present study sought to evaluate cardiovascular adaptations, such as blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and cardiac hypertrophy, to resistance training (RT) in a rat model. 2. The training protocol consisted of four sets of 10-12 repetitions of the squat exercise performed at 65-75% of one repetition maximum (1RM) over 4 weeks. Animals were randomly divided into three groups: control (n = 8, CO), electrically stimulated (n = 8, ES) and trained (n = 8, TR; also electrically stimulated). Blood pressure and HR were measured by a direct method in conscious rats after the training period. 3. All groups began with similar 1RM and 1RM/bodyweight (BW) ratio, however, at the end of the protocol only the TR group was different from the beginning (56% and 50%, respectively; both P < 0.01). The CO and ES groups had similar values for cardiac chambers weight/BW ratio, HR and diastolic, systolic and mean BP. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) determined by the left ventricle (LV) weight/BW ratio was increased in the TR group (12%) when compared to CO (P < 0.01) or ES groups (P < 0.01). No changes were found in the weights of the atrium or right ventricle. Diastolic (14%) and mean BP (13%) were lower in the TR group (P < 0.05), whereas systolic BP and HR remained unchanged. 4. Collectively these results demonstrate that the rat RT model used is associated with significant development of cardiac hypertrophy and lowering of resting BP. These cardiovascular adaptations seem to a result of the training exercise and not influenced by stress since circulating catecholamine levels and adrenal gland weights remained unchanged in all groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2005.04180.x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barauna, V. G., Junior, M. L. B., Costa Rosa, L. F. B., Casarini, D. E., Krieger, J. E., & Oliveira, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Oliveira, Edilamar M
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03-30
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
249-254
ISSN
  • 0305-1870 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1681
OpenAlex
W1997024683
Cited by
89
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
resistance training, cardiovascular adaptation, cardiac hypertrophy, left ventricular hypertrophy, blood pressure, heart rate, squatting, electrical stimulation, rat model, catecholamines, adrenal gland
MeSH terms
Adrenal Glands, Animals, Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena, Catecholamines, Electric Stimulation, Heart, Organ Size, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Random Allocation, Weight Lifting, Weight-Bearing, Rats, Wistar, Muscle, Skeletal, Models, Animal, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review