Cited by 77Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesEthics in Clinical ResearchQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Ethical suicide research: A survey of researchers

Open access
Lakeman, Richard, Fitzgerald, Mary·2009·International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Research is needed to better understand and respond effectively to people who are suicidal. Involving people who are suicidal in research poses some ethical and pragmatic problems. The ethical problems and difficulties in obtaining approval to involve people who are suicidal in research has contributed to the current paucity of research that explores the suicidal experience. To explore some of these problems, a web‐based survey of suicide researchers was undertaken. Researchers identified from published reports were contacted by email and invited to participate in a web‐based survey. Researchers were asked to describe any problems they encountered, how ethical problems were negotiated or resolved, and any advice received from human research ethics committees. The main problems identified were accessing the population, maintaining confidentiality, the extent of care owed by the researcher to participants, and the facilitation of support to participants. As with clinical practice, ethical research involving people who are suicidal involves a process of sensitive engagement, and careful consideration and remediation of risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2008.00569.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lakeman, R., & Fitzgerald, M.
Affiliations
  • Dublin City University (IE)
  • James Cook University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lakeman, Richard
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01-05
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
10-17
ISSN
  • 1445-8330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0349
OpenAlex
W2147810549
Cited by
77
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
suicide research, research ethics, research ethics committees, confidentiality, participant support, risk mitigation, research ethics approval
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude of Health Personnel, Australia, Confidentiality, United Kingdom, Humans, Informed Consent, Ireland, North America, Problem Solving, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Personnel, Safety, Social Support, Suicide, Attempted, Nursing Methodology Research, Negotiating, Internet, Ethics Committees, Research, Ethics, Research, Researcher-Subject Relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review