The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Cues and Impression Formation in CMC
Abstract
Social consequences of communication technology are based on widespread assumptions regarding effects of restricted capacity of mediated communication. Consequences are examined mostly in studies comparing face-to-face communication with various forms of mediated communication, confounding the availability of cues with other characteristics of media. Present research examines effects of restricted capacity to convey social cues independent of other differences between media. Assumptions are that limited capacity to convey social cues has negative consequences for the reduction of ambiguity and positivity of impressions, and limited capacity has particular social consequences. The first part of this assumption is confirmed in 3 studies. However, consequences of this limitation to convey social cues are less straightforward. The effect of limited capacity on the selecting of collaboration partners depends on the social identity of the parties involved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.10.1123 · Cited by 2,630
Information richness. A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1983) · doi:10.21236/ada128980 · Cited by 2,263
Panacea or Panopticon?: The Hidden Power in Computer-Mediated Communication
SPEARS, R., & LEA, M. (1994) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365094021004001 · Cited by 705
Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: a meta-analysis
Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.3.238 · Cited by 667
Cited by
Bente, G., Rüggenberg, S., Krämer, N. C., & Eschenburg, F. (2008) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00322.x · Cited by 503
Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2005) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.256 · Cited by 431
Self-citationAttentional capture helps explain why moral and emotional content go viral.
Brady, W. J., Gantman, A. P., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000673 · Cited by 166
To buy or not to buy: Influence of seller photos and reputation on buyer trust and purchase behavior
Bente, G., Baptist, O., & Leuschner, H. (2012) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.08.005 · Cited by 150
Leavitt, A. (2015) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675175 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanis, M., & Postmes, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2003-12-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 676-693
- ISSN
- 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091868106
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Cues and Impression Formation in CMC. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/joc/53.4.676
- The paper
- Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2003). Social Cues and Impression Formation in CMC. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/53.4.676
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.