CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,940Media Influence and PoliticsNews Media Framing and Political CommunicationElectoral Systems and Political Participation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use

Iyengar, Shanto, Hahn, Kyu S·2009·Journal of Communication
DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We show that the demand for news varies with the perceived affinity of the news organization to the consumer’s political preferences. In an experimental setting, conservatives and Republicans preferred to read news reports attributed to Fox News and to avoid news from CNN and NPR. Democrats and liberals exhibited exactly the opposite syndrome—dividing their attention equally between CNN and NPR, but avoiding Fox News. This pattern of selective exposure based on partisan affinity held not only for news coverage of controversial issues but also for relatively “soft” subjects such as crime and travel. The tendency to select news based on anticipated agreement was also strengthened among more politically engaged partisans. Overall, these results suggest that the further proliferation of new media and enhanced media choices may contribute to the further polarization of the news audience.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bumiller, 200823, McCain gathers support and donations in aftermath of article in The Times, The New York Times, p. A13
  2. Fiorina, 2005, Culture wars? The myth of polarized America
  3. Fox, 1997, Applied regression, linear models, and related methods
  4. Greene, 2003, Econometric analysis
  5. Hill, 2007, The opt-in internet panel: Survey mode, sampling methodology and the implications for political research
  6. Iyengar, 2007, Media and politics: A citizen’s guide
  7. Jacobson, 2000, Polarized politics, 9
  8. Pew Research Center for the People and Press, 2004, Online news audience larger, more diverse: News audience increasingly polarized
  9. Rutenberg, 200821, For McCain, self-confidence on ethics poses its own risk, The New York Times
  10. Sears, 1968, Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook, 777
  11. Smith, 1997, What the people want from the press
  12. Steinberg, 20076, Cable channel nods to ratings and leans left, The New York Times

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,001

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
ORCID
Iyengar, Shanto
Venue
Journal of Communication
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2009-03
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
19-39
ISSN
  • 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2466
DOI
10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
OpenAlex
W2166155258
Cited by
1,940
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 167 · 2021: 156 · 2020: 246 · 2019: 162 · 2018: 148 · 2017: 129 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 64
FWCI
148.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 2375 d)
Locations
Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
selective exposure, political affiliation, Fox News, convolutional neural networks, NPR, political polarization, political participation, new media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review