Cited by 114Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchStress Responses and Cortisol

Effects of inescapable stress on LTP in the amygdala versus the dentate gyrus of freely behaving rats

Vouimba, Rose‐Marie, Yaniv, Dan, Diamond, David, Richter‐Levin, Gal·2004·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Stress impairs hippocampal long‐term potentiation (LTP), a model of synaptic plasticity that is assumed to underlie memory formation. In the amygdala, little is known about the effects of stress on LTP, or about its longevity. Here we assessed the ability of entorhinal cortex (EC) stimulation to induce LTP simultaneously in the basal amygdaloid nucleus (B) and in the dentate gyrus (DG) of freely behaving Wistar rats. We also tested whether LTP persists over days. Once established, we investigated the effects of acute vs. repeated inescapable stressful experiences on LTP in both structures. Results show that B, like DG, sustained LTP for 7 days. Furthermore, a single exposure to moderate stress facilitated LTP in B but did not affect DG LTP. Stress re‐exposure inhibited LTP in DG but only long‐lasting LTP (>3 days) in B. Behaviourally, animals exhibited a higher immobility when re‐exposed to the stressor than with a single/first exposure. These data support a role for B in memory storage. Furthermore, they support a differential involvement of the amygdala and hippocampus in memory formation and storage depending on the emotional characteristics of the experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03294.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vouimba, R., Yaniv, D., Diamond, D., & Richter‐Levin, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Vouimba, Rose‐Marie
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-04
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
1887-1894
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2026356601
Cited by
114
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Charles H. Revson Foundation
  • Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
inescapable stress, long-term potentiation, amygdala, dentate gyrus, stress tolerance, memory storage, emotional memory, hippocampus, synaptic plasticity, immobility
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Electric Stimulation, Immobilization, Male, Synaptic Transmission, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Wakefulness, Rats, Wistar, Long-Term Potentiation, Entorhinal Cortex, Dentate Gyrus, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review