The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineering multiple genomic deletions in Gram‐negative bacteria: analysis of the multi‐resistant antibiotic profile of Pseudomonas putida KT2440
Abstract
Summary: The genome of the soil bacterium Pseudomonas putida strain KT2440 has been erased of various determinants of resistance to antibiotics encoded in its extant chromosome. To this end, we employed a coherent genetic platform that allowed the precise deletion of multiple genomic segments in a large variety of Gram‐negative bacteria including (but not limited to) P. putida . The method is based on the obligatory recombination between free‐ended homologous DNA sequences that are released as linear fragments generated upon the cleavage of the chromosome with unique I‐SceI sites, added to the segment of interest by the vector system. Despite the potential for a SOS response brought about by the appearance of double stranded DNA breaks during the process, fluctuation experiments revealed that the procedure did not increase mutation rates – perhaps due to the protection exerted by I‐SceI bound to the otherwise naked DNA termini. With this tool in hand we made sequential deletions of genes mexC, mexE, ttgA and ampC in the genome of the target bacterium, orthologues of which are known to determine various degrees of antibiotic resistance in diverse microorganisms. Inspection of the corresponding phenotypes demonstrated that the efflux pump encoded by ttgA sufficed to endow P. putida with a high‐level of tolerance to β‐lactams, chloramphenicol and quinolones, but had little effect on, e.g. aminoglycosides. Analysis of the mutants revealed also a considerable diversity in the manifestation of the resistance phenotype within the population and suggested a degree of synergism between different pumps. The directed edition of the P. putida chromosome shown here not only enhances the amenability of this bacterium to deep genomic engineering, but also validates the corresponding approach for similar handlings of a large variety of Gram‐negative microorganisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance
Poole, K. (2005) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dki171 · Cited by 1,082
Ponder, R. G., Fonville, N. C., & Rosenberg, S. M. (2005) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.025 · Cited by 257
Cited by
Calero, P., Gurdo, N., & Nikel, P. I. (2022) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.16110 · Cited by 56
Biogenesis of a bacterial metabolosome for propanediol utilization
Yang, M., Wenner, N., Dykes, G. F., Li, Y., Zhu, X., Sun, Y., Huang, F., Hinton, J. C. D., & Liu, L.-N. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30608-w · Cited by 45
Suenaga, H., Fujihara, H., Kimura, N., Hirose, J., Watanabe, T., Futagami, T., Goto, M., Shimodaira, J., & Furukawa, K. (2017) · Environmental Microbiology Reports · doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12561 · Cited by 26
Mumm, K., Ainsaar, K., Kasvandik, S., Tenson, T., & Hõrak, R. (2016) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00420 · Cited by 19
Vacheron, J., Heiman, C. M., Garneau, J. R., Kupferschmied, P., de Jonge, R., Garrido-Sanz, D., & Keel, C. (2023) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.02049-23 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Martínez‐García, E., & de Lorenzo, V.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-08-24
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2702-2716
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W1574719834
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering multiple genomic deletions in Gram‐negative bacteria: analysis of the multi‐resistant antibiotic profile of Pseudomonas putida KT2440. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02538.x
- The paper
- Martínez‐García, E., & de Lorenzo, V. (2011). Engineering multiple genomic deletions in Gram‐negative bacteria: analysis of the multi‐resistant antibiotic profile of Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02538.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.