Cited by 118Research on Leishmaniasis StudiesLeprosy Research and TreatmentLeech Biology and Applications

The impact of vector-mediated neutrophil recruitment on cutaneous leishmaniasis

Open access
Peters, Nathan C., Sacks, David L.·2009·Cellular Microbiology

Abstract

The dynamic process of pathogen transmission by the bite of an insect vector combines several biological processes that have undergone extensive co-evolution. Whereas the host response to an insect bite is only occasionally confronted with the parasitic pathogens that competent vectors might transmit, the transmitted parasites will always be confronted with the acute, wound-healing response that is initiated by the bite itself. Invariably, this response involves neutrophils. In the case of Leishmania, infection is initiated in the skin following the bite of an infected sand fly, suggesting that Leishmania must possess some means to survive their early encounter with recruited neutrophils at the bite site. Here, we review the literature regarding the impact of neutrophils on the outcome of infection with Leishmania, with special attention to the role of the sand fly bite.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01348.x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peters, N. C., & Sacks, D. L.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Cellular Microbiology
Published
2009-09
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
1290-1296
ISSN
  • 1462-5814 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-5822
OpenAlex
W2036625865
Cited by
118
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cellular Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (ZIAAI000494)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Leprosy Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Leech Biology and Applications
Keywords
cutaneous leishmaniasis, Leishmania, neutrophils, sandfly bite, insect vector transmission, wound healing response, host-pathogen interaction, neutrophil recruitment
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Insect Bites and Stings, Insect Vectors, Leishmania, Psychodidae, Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous, Neutrophil Infiltration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review