Cited by 756Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative MechanismsAntimicrobial Peptides and ActivitiesRedox biology and oxidative stress

How human neutrophils kill and degrade microbes: an integrated view

Nauseef, William M.·2007·Immunological Reviews

Abstract

Summary: Neutrophils constitute the dominant cell in the circulation that mediates the earliest innate immune human responses to infection. The morbidity and mortality from infection rise dramatically in patients with quantitative or qualitative neutrophil defects, providing clinical confirmation of the important role of normal neutrophils for human health. Neutrophil‐dependent anti‐microbial activity against ingested microbes represents the collaboration of multiple agents, including those prefabricated during granulocyte development in the bone marrow and those generated de novo following neutrophil activation. Furthermore, neutrophils cooperate with extracellular agents as well as other immune cells to optimally kill and degrade invading microbes. This brief review focuses attention on two examples of the integrated nature of neutrophil‐mediated anti‐microbial action within the phagosome. The importance and complexity of myeloperoxidase‐mediated events illustrate a collaboration of anti‐microbial responses that are endogenous to the neutrophil, whereas the synergy between the phagocyte NADPH (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate) oxidase and plasma‐derived group IIA phospholipase A 2 exemplifies the collective effects of the neutrophil with an exogenous factor to achieve degradation of ingested staphylococci.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-065x.2007.00550.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nauseef, W. M.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Nauseef, William M.
Venue
Immunological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-09-10
Volume
219
Issue
1
Pages
88-102
ISSN
  • 0105-2896 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-065X
OpenAlex
W2108585076
Cited by
756
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 67
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Immunological Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX000513)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL053592, HL-53592)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI44642, AI 34879, P01AI044642)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
Keywords
neutrophils, phagocytosis, phagosome, microbial killing, myeloperoxidase, NADPH oxidase, group IIA phospholipase A2, Staphylococcus, innate immunity, neutrophil defects, neutrophil activation
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Fungi, Humans, Infections, Peroxidase, Neutrophils, Phagocytosis, Phagosomes, Neutrophil Activation, NADPH Oxidases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review