CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 190Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorBehavioral Health and InterventionsWorkplace Health and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Industrial and Organisation Research on Self‐Regulation: From Constructs to Applications

Vancouver, Jeffrey B., Day, David V.·2005·Applied Psychology
DOI 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00202.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

L’autorégulation rencontre actuellement du succès en psychologie industrielle et organisationnelle. Les travaux théoriques et empiriques englobent des processus allant de l’entrée dans l’organisation à la sortie et à la réembauche. Les interventions et les concepts clés de l’autorégulation dans le monde du travail sont recensés en insistant sur la validité interne et de construction. Quelques concepts comme l’efficacité personnelle et l’implication ont bénéficié d’un grand intérêt de la part des psychométriciens et semblent constituer des cibles de premier ordre lors des interventions. Néanmoins, ces concepts restent entachés d’hypothèses dont la validité n’est pas garantie. D’autres concepts, en particulier la rétroaction et la divergence, souffrent de significations sensiblement différentes dans la littérature sur l’autorégulation, ce qui nuit à la compréhension et à la communication entre les universitaires et les praticiens. On a lancé des interventions relevant des principes de l’autorégulation; celles‐ei ont ensuite étéévaluées avec sérieux: il est apparu qu’elles avaient un impact sur un ensemble de variables pertinentes du point de vue organisationnel comme l’amélioration des performances et la réduction de l’absentéisme. Malheureusement, les interventions sont rarement étudiées de façon détaúllée et systématique, ce qui ne permet pas de tirer des conclusions sur les aspects de l’intervention qui sont pertinents du point de vue de la causalité. La discussion insiste s…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00202.x

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.8 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Boyer D.A. Zollo J.S. Thompson C.M. Vancouver J.B. Shewring K. &Sims E.(2000 June). A quantitative review of the effects of manipulated self‐efficacy on performance. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society Miami FL.
  3. Donovan J.J., 2002, The handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology, 53
  4. 10.2307/258770 · DOI
  5. Greenberg J., 1990, Research in organizational behavior, 111
  6. Hackman J.R., 1980, Work redesign
  7. Kirkpatrick D.L., 1975, Evaluating training programs: A collection of articles from the Journal of the American Society for Training and Development
  8. 10.2307/258414 · DOI
  9. 10.2307/258790 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/258352 · DOI
  11. Pritchard R.D., 2002, Improving organizational performance with the Productivity Measurement and Enhancement System: An international collaboration
  12. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1100 · DOI
  13. 10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.407 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 190

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Vancouver, J. B., & Day, D. V.
Affiliations
  • Ohio University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Vancouver, Jeffrey B.
ORCID
Venue
Applied Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03-21
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
155-185
ISSN
  • 0269-994X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0597
DOI
10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00202.x
OpenAlex
W2145442968
Cited by
190
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
15.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
self-regulation, self-regulation interventions, self-efficacy, goal commitment, feedback, discrepancy, personal effectiveness, work engagement, employee performance, absenteeism, construct validity, internal validity, theory-practice gap, employee turnover, employee well-being, employee motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review