Cited by 175Diabetes Management and EducationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Diabetes and anxiety in US adults: findings from the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

Li, C., Barker, L., Ford, E. S., Zhang, X., Strine, T. W., Mokdad, A. H.·2008·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Aims Anxiety disorders may cause substantial impairment in patient functioning and well‐being. Little is known about the relationship between diabetes and anxiety. We estimated the prevalence of lifetime diagnosis of anxiety in adults aged ≥ 18 years with and without diabetes in the USA. Methods We analysed data from the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (total, N = 201 575; 20 142 with diabetes; 39.4% men, 77.9% non‐Hispanic Whites, 8.1% non‐Hispanic Blacks and 7.7% Hispanics; mean age 52.4 years). Diabetes and lifetime diagnosis of anxiety were self‐reported. A multivariable log–binomial model was used to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) of anxiety based on diabetes status. Results The overall age‐adjusted prevalence of lifetime diagnosis of anxiety was 19.5 and 10.9% in people with and without diabetes, respectively. After adjustment for educational level, marital status, employment status, current smoking, leisure‐time physical activity and body mass index, people with diabetes had a 20% higher prevalence of lifetime diagnosis of anxiety than those without (PR 1.20; 95% CI 1.12, 1.30). There were no significant differences in the PR by gender (P = 0.06). However, the ratios differed significantly by age (P = 0.04) and by race/ethnicity (P < 0.01), indicating that people aged 18−29 years (PR 1.70; 95% CI 1.19, 2.43) and Hispanics (PR 1.69; 95% CI 1.33, 2.15) had a higher ratio than their counterparts. Conclusion Diabetes was significantly associated with anxiety in adults in this large population‐based sample, particularly in Hispanics and young adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02477.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, C., Barker, L., Ford, E. S., Zhang, X., Strine, T. W., & Mokdad, A. H.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
  • Li, C.
  • Ford, E. S.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
878-881
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2072750128
Cited by
175
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorders, prevalence, Hispanic adults, young adults, racial and ethnic differences, sex differences, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Diabetic Neuropathies, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review