The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INTERLANGUAGE AS CHAMELEON1
Abstract
The clam is made that Labov's “Observor's Paradox” and the fire methodological axioms leading to this paradox apply to inter language Thus, we may mew interlanguage as a continuum of styles, which is defined by the amount of attention paid to speech; the most systematic second‐language learner speech is produced when the learner is paying the least attention to speech. Yet, when we do research, the presence of the researcher and the tasks presented to the learner, lead our subjects to pay attention to their speech. Therefore, we cannot claim that research can ever observe the most truly systematic form of a learner's interlanguage—unattended or “unmonitored” speech. The methodological implications of the claim are explored, and recommendations for research are made.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the nature of interlanguage systems
Adjemian, C. (1976) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1976.tb00279.x · Cited by 293
Cited by
The Acquisition of Heritage Languages
Montrul, S. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139030502 · Cited by 900
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/aml029 · Cited by 805
Consciousness-Raising and the Second Language Learner1
SMITH, M. S. (1981) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/ii.2.159 · Cited by 530
SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING: AN INFORMATION‐PROCESSING PERSPECTIVE1
McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B. (1983) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00532.x · Cited by 348
Japanese Adults can Learn to Produce English /I/ and /l/ Accurately
Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1995) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/002383099503800102 · Cited by 225
Authentic Discourse and the Survival English Curriculum
Cathcart, R. L. (1989) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587510 · Cited by 84
Typological characteristics of interlanguage: Across native language types and L2 proficiency levels
Hao, Y., Wang, X., & Yu, Q. (2021) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103085 · Cited by 9
Chapter 3. From Julie to Wes to Alberto: Revisiting the construct of fossilization
Han, Z. (2014) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.39.05ch3 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Tarone, E.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 181-191
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W2151997686
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 54.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
