The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Task Complexity and Second Language Narrative Discourse
Abstract
Researchers need to identify what differences second language tasks set at different levels of complexity make to measures of learner language, in order to provide a basis for pedagogic decisions about grading and sequencing such tasks. This study examined differences in the production of oral narrative discourse by 12 adult second language learners of English on narrative tasks that simulated the ability to describe events in the Here‐and‐Now versus the There‐and‐Then. Target‐like use, propositional and syntactic complexity, lexical load, pausing, and utterance length were measured under the two conditions. A MANOVA showed significant differences between the two conditions. Separate ANOVAs for each measure showed a significant difference between the two conditions for measures of lexical load and an almost significant difference for measures of target‐like use. The more complex There‐and‐Then condition elicited greater accuracy and a higher ratio of lexical to grammatical words. There was also a trend suggesting greater utterance length for narratives performed under the simpler Here‐and‐Now condition. These results support the claim that complex tasks elicit less fluent, but more accurate and complex production than do simpler tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning
Sweller, J. (1988) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7 · Cited by 11,048
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
Speaking: From Intention to Articulation
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001 · Cited by 4,804
A First Language: The Early Stages
Brown, R. (1973) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674732469 · Cited by 4,484
Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach.
Calinski, T., Steel, R. G. D., & Torrie, J. H. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530180 · Cited by 4,337
Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom
Siskin, H. J., & Nunan, D. (1990) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327949 · Cited by 2,301
An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315835891 · Cited by 2,173
(1979) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-10728-3 · Cited by 1,634
Allen, J. P. B., & Prabhu, N. S. (1988) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587293 · Cited by 1,627
Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure
Naigles, L. (1991) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/002383099103400105 · Cited by 1,618
Cited by
Attention, Memory, and the “Noticing” Hypothesis
Robinson, P. (1995) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.x · Cited by 745
Self-citationDefining and operationalising L2 complexity
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.32.02bul · Cited by 587
Task-based research and language pedagogy
Ellis, R. (2000) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/136216880000400302 · Cited by 579
The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance
Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/136216880000400305 · Cited by 562
Attention and Memory during SLA
Robinson, P. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch19 · Cited by 402
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson, P.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-140
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W2006387885
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Task Complexity and Second Language Narrative Discourse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00964.x
- The paper
- Robinson, P. (1995). Task Complexity and Second Language Narrative Discourse. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00964.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.