Cited by 562EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance

Dörnyei, Zoltán, Kormos, Judit·2000·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

This paper reports on a data-based study in which we explored - as part of a larger-scale British-Hungarian research project - the effects of a number of affective and social variables on foreign language (L2) learners’ engagement in oral argumentative tasks. The assumption underlying the investigation was that students’ verbal behaviour in oral task situations is partly determined by a number of non-linguistic and non-cognitive factors whose examination may constitute a potentially fruitful extension of existing task-based research paradigms. The independent variables in the study included various aspects of L2 motivation and several factors characterizing the learner groups the participating students were members of (such as group cohesiveness and intermember relations), as well as the learners’ L2 proficiency and ‘willingness to communicate’ in their L1. The dependent variables involved objective measures of the students’ language output in two oral argumentative tasks (one in the learners’ L1, the other in their L2): the quantity of speech and the number of turns produced by the speakers. The results provide insights into the interrelationship of the multiple variables determining the learners’ task engagement, and suggest a multi-level construct whereby some independent variables only come into force when certain conditions have been met.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/136216880000400305

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Earlier work in SLA on engagement at the class level depended largely on gross measures of quantity of talk among learners, which captured only aspects of behavioral engagement.

    “As noted above, earlier work in SLA on engagement at the class level depended largely on gross measures of quantity of talk among learners (Bygate & Samuda, 2009; Dörnyei &Kormos, 2000). However, this captured only aspects of behavioral engagement.”

    From Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom (2016) · cites this paper as Dörnyei &Kormos, 2000

  • The relationship between interaction and learner psychology has been under-investigated.

    “Indeed, the relationship between interaction and learner psychology has been under-investigated, although as early as 2000, Dörnyei & Kormos (2000) argued that 'all the cognitive and linguistic processes discussed in the L2 task literature depend, to some extent, on this initial condition [task attitudes]' (p.281).”

    From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Dörnyei & Kormos (2000)

  • Task motivation has been under-investigated.

    “In particular, task motivation, which explains 'why students behave as they do in a specific learning situation where they are carrying out a specific task' (Csizér 2017: 424-425), has been under-investigated (see Dörnyei & Kormos 2000;Kormos & Préfontaine 2016;Poupore 2016).”

    From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Dörnyei & Kormos 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
Corresponding author
Dörnyei, Zoltán
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2000-07
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
275-300
ISSN
  • 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0954
OpenAlex
W2073454183
Cited by
562
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 22
FWCI
24.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
foreign language learners, task engagement, second language motivation, group cohesion, willingness to communicate, second language proficiency, turn-taking, extralinguistic factors, task-based language teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review