The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance
Abstract
This paper reports on a data-based study in which we explored - as part of a larger-scale British-Hungarian research project - the effects of a number of affective and social variables on foreign language (L2) learners’ engagement in oral argumentative tasks. The assumption underlying the investigation was that students’ verbal behaviour in oral task situations is partly determined by a number of non-linguistic and non-cognitive factors whose examination may constitute a potentially fruitful extension of existing task-based research paradigms. The independent variables in the study included various aspects of L2 motivation and several factors characterizing the learner groups the participating students were members of (such as group cohesiveness and intermember relations), as well as the learners’ L2 proficiency and ‘willingness to communicate’ in their L1. The dependent variables involved objective measures of the students’ language output in two oral argumentative tasks (one in the learners’ L1, the other in their L2): the quantity of speech and the number of turns produced by the speakers. The results provide insights into the interrelationship of the multiple variables determining the learners’ task engagement, and suggest a multi-level construct whereby some independent variables only come into force when certain conditions have been met.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Earlier work in SLA on engagement at the class level depended largely on gross measures of quantity of talk among learners, which captured only aspects of behavioral engagement.
“As noted above, earlier work in SLA on engagement at the class level depended largely on gross measures of quantity of talk among learners (Bygate & Samuda, 2009; Dörnyei &Kormos, 2000). However, this captured only aspects of behavioral engagement.”
From Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom (2016) · cites this paper as Dörnyei &Kormos, 2000
The relationship between interaction and learner psychology has been under-investigated.
“Indeed, the relationship between interaction and learner psychology has been under-investigated, although as early as 2000, Dörnyei & Kormos (2000) argued that 'all the cognitive and linguistic processes discussed in the L2 task literature depend, to some extent, on this initial condition [task attitudes]' (p.281).”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Dörnyei & Kormos (2000)
Task motivation has been under-investigated.
“In particular, task motivation, which explains 'why students behave as they do in a specific learning situation where they are carrying out a specific task' (Csizér 2017: 424-425), has been under-investigated (see Dörnyei & Kormos 2000;Kormos & Préfontaine 2016;Poupore 2016).”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Dörnyei & Kormos 2000
Cites
The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.
Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210 · Cited by 1,398 · see citing works
The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100015047 · Cited by 1,147 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…in language learning tasks as basic conceptual units to analyse learning behaviours that lead to second language (L2) acquisition (e.g. Bygate, 1996, 1999; Candlin and Murphy, 1987; Crookes and Gass, 1993a, 1993b; Foster, 1998; Foster and Skehan, 1996; Long and © Arnold 2000 1362–1688(00)LR071.”
BackgroundThree Approaches to Task-Based Syllabus Design
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587368 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Conceptualizing Motivation in Foreign‐Language Learning*
Dörnyei, Z. (1990) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00954.x · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000094 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Engagement in language learning: a systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2024) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688211001289 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
“Behavioral engagement corresponds with the amount and quality of learners’ active participation in learning, and early L2 research operationalized behavioral engagement by measuring word counts and turn counts (Bygate & Samuda, 2009; Dörnyei & Kormos, 2000; Platt & Brooks, 2002).”
BackgroundExploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners
Kormos, J., & Dénes (2004) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
Self-citationCao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Interaction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
The motivational dimension of language teaching
Lamb, M. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444817000088 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Dewaele, J.-M. (2007) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/13670069070110040301 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
A Comparison of L2–L2 and L2–Heritage Learner Interactions in Spanish Language Classrooms
Bowles, M. A., Adams, R. J., & Toth, P. D. (2014) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12086 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
The Relationship between WTC and Oral Proficiency Measurements in the Study Abroad Context
Robson, G. G. (2015) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v8n12p56 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“It was measured by number of turns and length of turns (Dörnyei & Kormos, 2000).”
- Authors
- Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
- Corresponding author
- Dörnyei, Zoltán
- Venue
- Language Teaching Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 275-300
- ISSN
- 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0954
- OpenAlex
- W2073454183
- Cited by
- 562
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 24.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- foreign language learners, task engagement, second language motivation, group cohesion, willingness to communicate, second language proficiency, turn-taking, extralinguistic factors, task-based language teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review