The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reflections on the ‘Realist Turn’ in Organization and Management Studies
Abstract
abstract This paper has three objectives. First, to provide an exposition of the ‘realist turn’ in contemporary organization and management studies. Second, to assess the detailed implications of this incipient ‘realist turn’ for the underlying explanatory principles and practices that should inform organization and management studies as a social scientific field. Third, to evaluate the potential, longer‐term, impact of these explanatory principles and practices in an intellectual context where anti‐realist ontologies and epistemologies have been dominant. This will entail a critique of contemporary approaches that draw on a social constructionist ontology and a postmodernist epistemology. Overall, the paper concludes that the ‘realist turn’ creates a significant intellectual opportunity and space in which the historical sociology of dynamic organizational forms and managerial control regimes can be rediscovered and renewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers
Jackall, R. (1988) · International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society · doi:10.1007/bf01390690 · Cited by 1,296
Layder, D. (1998) · doi:10.4135/9781849209946 · Cited by 585
Cited by
Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421 · Cited by 1,116
1 Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication
Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520903047186 · Cited by 731
Belfrage, C., & Hauf, F. (2017) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840616663239 · Cited by 259
Qualitative research in marketing: what can academics do better?
Crick, J. M. (2021) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2020.1743738 · Cited by 172
Organizational Closure Competencies and Scaling: A Realist Approach to Theorizing Social Enterprise
Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2014) · Social Entrepreneurship and Research Methods · doi:10.1108/s1479-838720140000009014 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Reed, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1621-1644
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2087219917
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.