The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Minority Employees Engaging with (Diversity) Management: An Analysis of Control, Agency, and Micro‐Emancipation*
Open accessAbstract
abstract This study analyses how minority employees engage with control in organizations. Differently from most critical studies of diversity management, which focus on how minority employees are discursively controlled, we approach (diversity) management as a constellation of both identity‐regulating discourses and bureaucratic controls. We assume that minority employees are agents who actively resist and/or comply with the constellation of controls they are subject to. Based on qualitative data collected in a technical drawing company and a hospital, the specific constellation of controls in each organization is first reconstructed. Four interviews with minority employees are then analysed in depth, showing how their engagement with material and discursive controls creates both constraints and possibilities of micro‐emancipation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Case study research: design and methods
Phelan, S. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317 · Cited by 21,763
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
Fee, D., & Fairclough, N. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074659 · Cited by 11,611
Building theories from case study research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2009) · STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI · doi:10.3280/so2008-002004 · Cited by 11,299
Braverman, H. (1974) · Monthly Review · doi:10.14452/mr-026-03-1974-07_1 · Cited by 5,505
Cited by
Zanoni, P., Janssens, M., Benschop, Y., & Nkomo, S. (2010) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508409350344 · Cited by 593
Self-citationThe Theory and Praxis of Intersectionality in Work and Organisations: Where Do We Go From Here?
Rodriguez, J. K., Holvino, E., Fletcher, J. K., & Nkomo, S. M. (2016) · Gender, Work & Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.12131 · Cited by 287
Tatli, A. (2011) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00730.x · Cited by 257
Cheon, E., Zaga, C., Lee, H. R., Lupetti, M. L., Dombrowski, L., & Jung, M. F. (2021) · Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing · doi:10.1145/3462204.3481726 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Zanoni, P., & Janssens, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-26
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1371-1397
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2041487439
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minority Employees Engaging with (Diversity) Management: An Analysis of Control, Agency, and Micro‐Emancipation*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00700.x
- The paper
- Zanoni, P., & Janssens, M. (2007). Minority Employees Engaging with (Diversity) Management: An Analysis of Control, Agency, and Micro‐Emancipation*. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00700.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
