CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,335Innovation and Knowledge ManagementKnowledge Management and SharingInnovative Education and Learning Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inter‐ and Intra‐Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta‐Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences

Van Wijk, Raymond, Jansen, Justin J. P., Lyles, Marjorie A.·2008·Journal of Management Studies
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

abstract Research on organizational knowledge transfer is burgeoning, and yet our understanding of its antecedents and consequences remains rather unclear. Although conceptual and qualitative reviews of the organizational knowledge transfer literature have emerged, no study has attempted to summarize previous quantitative empirical findings. As a first step towards that goal, we use meta‐analytic techniques to examine how knowledge, organization and network level antecedents differentially impact organizational knowledge transfer. Additionally, we consolidate research on the relationship between knowledge transfer and its consequences. We also demonstrate how the intra‐ and inter‐organizational context, the directionality of knowledge transfers, and measurement characteristics moderate the relationships studied. By aggregating and consolidating existing research, our study not only reveals new insights into the levers and outcomes of organizational knowledge transfer, but also provides meaningful directions for future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 103

  1. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<317::AID-SMJ90>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  2. 10.1002/smj.388 · DOI
  3. 10.1006/obhd.2000.2883 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/smj.387 · DOI
  5. 10.1287/orsc.13.3.274.2778 · DOI
  6. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400094 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00272-2 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.07.002 · DOI
  9. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490078 · DOI
  10. 10.1287/orsc.12.1.19.10119 · DOI
  11. 10.5465/AMR.2006.20208690 · DOI
  12. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
  13. 10.2307/2393553 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.2307/20159632 · DOI
  15. 10.1287/orsc.1040.0075 · DOI
  16. 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134 · DOI
  17. Cyert R., 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm
  18. 10.2307/256406 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1287/mnsc.41.11.1750 · DOI
  20. 10.2307/1251915 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00096.x · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.021 · DOI
  23. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400098 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200002)21:2<99::AID-SMJ80>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  25. 10.1111/1467-6486.00203 · DOI
  26. 10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1002/smj.273 · DOI
  28. 10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.44 · DOI
  29. 10.2307/3152095 · DOI
  30. 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0192 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4<473::AID-SMJ84>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
  32. Hambrick D. C., 1994, Research in Organizational Behavior, 171
  33. 10.1287/orsc.13.3.232.2771 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/smj.421 · DOI
  35. Hedges L. V., 1985, Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis
  36. 10.1002/smj.4250150906 · DOI
  37. 10.2307/20159575 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/1467-6486.00215 · DOI
  39. 10.5465/AMR.2005.15281445 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.5465/amj.2005.19573106 · DOI
  41. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400107 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<217::AID-SMJ95>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
  43. 10.2307/3069433 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1002/smj.297 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00482.x · DOI
  46. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1002/smj.206 · DOI
  48. 10.5465/amr.2006.22527456 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1002/smj.379 · DOI
  50. 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136 · DOI
  51. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490923 · DOI
  52. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490155 · DOI
  53. 10.1287/orsc.14.2.173.14997 · DOI
  54. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490156 · DOI
  55. 10.1287/orsc.14.3.297.15165 · DOI
  56. 10.1002/smj.484 · DOI
  57. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400056 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/smj.4250171108 · DOI
  59. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400120 · DOI
  60. 10.1177/0170840605050874 · DOI
  61. 10.1002/smj.329 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00395-8 · DOI
  63. 10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.260 · DOI
  64. 10.1177/014920639902500406 · DOI
  65. 10.1111/1540-5885.00028 · DOI
  66. 10.2307/3556658 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.2307/258107 · DOI
  68. 10.1509/jmkg.65.2.1.18253 · DOI
  69. 10.1002/smj.398 · DOI
  70. 10.1287/mnsc.49.6.751.16026 · DOI
  71. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<369::AID-SMJ93>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  72. 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1 · DOI
  73. 10.2307/3069409 · DOI
  74. 10.1287/orsc.14.4.440.17483 · DOI
  75. 10.2307/259020 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.07.003 · DOI
  77. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199907)20:7<595::AID-SMJ47>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
  78. 10.2307/256726 · DOI
  79. 10.5465/amj.2005.16928421 · DOI
  80. 10.1002/smj.290 · DOI
  81. 10.1002/1097-0266(200008)21:8<831::AID-SMJ123>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  82. 10.5465/AMJ.2005.16928394 · DOI
  83. 10.1002/smj.163 · DOI
  84. 10.1287/orsc.1040.0096 · DOI
  85. 10.1002/smj.337 · DOI
  86. 10.1002/1097-0266(200009)21:9<925::AID-SMJ129>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
  87. Tsai W., 2001, Knowledge transfer in intra‐organizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 996, 10.2307/3069443 · DOI
  88. 10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536 · DOI
  89. 10.2307/257085 · DOI
  90. 10.1002/smj.251 · DOI
  91. 10.1002/smj.4250160917 · DOI
  92. 10.2307/20159030 · DOI
  93. 10.1287/orsc.1050.0126 · DOI
  94. 10.1287/orsc.1040.0080 · DOI
  95. 10.1002/smj.183 · DOI
  96. 10.1002/smj.482 · DOI
  97. 10.2307/4134351 · DOI · Paper page
  98. 10.1002/smj.229 · DOI
  99. 10.2307/1556420 · DOI · Paper page
  100. 10.1287/orsc.6.1.76 · DOI
  101. 10.1177/0170840605051820 · DOI
  102. 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.514.14423 · DOI
  103. 10.1287/orsc.8.3.209 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,335

Metadata

Authors
Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J. J. P., & Lyles, M. A.
Affiliations
Indiana University (US)
Corresponding author
Van Wijk, Raymond
ORCID
Jansen, Justin J. P.
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-05-02
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
830-853
ISSN
  • 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6486
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x
OpenAlex
W2007467847
Cited by
1,335
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 101 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 84
FWCI
137.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Keywords
organizational knowledge transfer, inter-organizational knowledge transfer, intra-organizational knowledge transfer, knowledge networks, moderating effect, measurement properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review