The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Middle Managers, Strategic Sensemaking, and Discursive Competence
Open accessAbstract
This paper seeks to better understand the way middle managers contribute strategically to the development of an organization by examining how they enact the strategic roles allocated to them, with particular reference to strategic change. Through vignettes drawn from the authors' current research, a framework is developed that shows two situated, but interlinked, discursive activities, ‘performing the conversation’ and ‘setting the scene’, to be critical to the accomplishment of middle manager sensemaking. Language use is key, but needs to be combined with an ability to devise a setting in which to perform the language. The paper shows how middle managers knowledgeably enact these two sets of discursive activities by drawing on contextually relevant verbal, symbolic, and sociocultural systems, to allow them to draw people from different organizational levels into the change as they go about their day‐to‐day work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008
Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776 · Cited by 3,021
Cited by
Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.873177 · Cited by 1,764
Communication, Organizing and Organization: An Overview and Introduction to the Special Issue
Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840611410836 · Cited by 585
Boundary Spanning in Global Organizations
Schotter, A. P. J., Mudambi, R., Doz, Y. L., & Gaur, A. (2017) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12256 · Cited by 363
Kjaergaard, A., Morsing, M., & Ravasi, D. (2011) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00954.x · Cited by 149
Change in a culture of collegiality and consensus-seeking: a double-edged sword
McGrath, C., Roxå, T., & Bolander Laksov, K. (2019) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2019.1603203 · Cited by 38
The Impact of Gender and Organizational Position on Faith-Work Integration
Daniels, D., Ecklund, E. H., Thomson, R. A., & Kalinowski, B. (2022) · Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion · doi:10.51327/bihn6411 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Rouleau, L., & Balogun, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-06-13
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 953-983
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2110738270
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 40.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.