Cited by 652Grit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

On the Role of Passion in Performance

Vallerand, Robert J., Salvy, Sarah‐Jeanne, Mageau, Geneviève A., Elliot, Andrew J., Denis, Pascale L., Grouzet, Frédéric M. E., Blanchard, Céline·2007·Journal of Personality

Abstract

ABSTRACT The present paper reports two studies designed to test the Dualistic Model of Passion with regard to performance attainment in two fields of expertise. Results from both studies supported the Passion Model. Harmonious passion was shown to be a positive source of activity investment in that it directly predicted deliberate practice ( Study 1 ) and positively predicted mastery goals which in turn positively predicted deliberate practice ( Study 2 ). In turn, deliberate practice had a direct positive impact on performance attainment. Obsessive passion was shown to be a mixed source of activity investment. While it directly predicted deliberate practice ( Study 1 ) and directly predicted mastery goals (which predicted deliberate practice), it also predicted performance‐avoidance and performance‐approach goals, with the former having a tendency to facilitate performance directly, and the latter to directly negatively impact on performance attainment ( Study 2 ). Finally, harmonious passion was also positively related to subjective well‐being (SWB) in both studies, while obsessive passion was either unrelated ( Study 1 ) or negatively related to SWB ( Study 2 ). The conceptual and applied implications of the differential influences of harmonious and obsessive passion in performance are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00447.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vallerand, R. J., Salvy, S., Mageau, G. A., Elliot, A. J., Denis, P. L., Grouzet, F. M. E., & Blanchard, C.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Vallerand, Robert J.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04-06
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
505-534
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2097652369
Cited by
652
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 29
FWCI
18.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
passion, harmonious passion, obsessive passion, dualistic model of passion, deliberate practice, mastery goals, performance-avoidance goals, performance-approach goals, subjective well-being, expertise
MeSH terms
Adult, Canada, Drama, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Practice, Psychological, Students, Task Performance and Analysis, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review