Cited by 154Grit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Driven by fear: The effect of success and failure information on passionate individuals' performance.

Bélanger, Jocelyn J., Lafrenière, Marc-André K., Vallerand, Robert J., Kruglanski, Arie W.·2013·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Four studies investigated the impact of success and failure information on passionate individuals' performance. Obsessive passion, characterized by a rigid and defensive mode of functioning, predicted greater performance in domains both related and unrelated to the passionate activity in response to exposure to failure information. Conversely, harmonious passion, characterized by a flexible, nondefensive mode of functioning, was found to be unaffected by success or failure information. These performance effects were deeply ingrained, did not require conscious thought, and were automatically activated after unconscious exposure to failure-related words. In addition, the present research evinced that following failure information, obsessive passion predicted increases of performance through its effect on fear of failure. However, performance augmented only when the performance task was framed in such a way that failure would entail important negative consequences for the self and not when framed as inconsequential.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0029585

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bélanger and colleagues found that university students randomly assigned to an induction of harmonious passion reported more use of adaptive learning strategies than those assigned to an induction of obsessive passion.

    “Employing it, these authors found that university students randomly assigned to an induction of harmonious passion 1 reported more use of adaptive learning strategies (e.g., 'I usually call friends in my class and we quiz each other') than those assigned to an induction of obsessive passion 2 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bélanger, J. J., Lafrenière, M.-A. K., Vallerand, R. J., & Kruglanski, A. W.
Affiliations
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2013-01
Volume
104
Issue
1
Pages
180-195
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2139817599
Cited by
153
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
obsessive passion, harmonious passion, performance, fear of failure, automatic activation, unconscious priming, task framing
MeSH terms
Adult, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Neuropsychological Tests, Obsessive Behavior, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Task Performance and Analysis, Single-Blind Method, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review