Cited by 588Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAging and Gerontology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Hierarchical Structure of Well‐Being

Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Theories of hedonic, eudaimonic, and social well‐being provide 3 extensively studied models for explaining flourishing mental health. Few studies have examined whether these models can be integrated into a comprehensive structure of well‐being. The present study builds upon previous theoretical and empirical work to determine the complex relationships among these 3 models of well‐being. Confirmatory factor analysis techniques were used to test a series of models in order to (a) confirm the proposed latent structures of hedonic, eudaimonic, and social well‐being and (b) examine whether these models could be successfully integrated into a hierarchical structure of well‐being. In 2 large samples, results supported the proposed latent structures of hedonic, eudaimonic, and social well‐being and indicated that the various components of well‐being could be represented most parsimoniously with 3 oblique second‐order constructs of hedonic, eudaimonic, and social well‐being.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00573.x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 588

Metadata

Authors
Gallagher, M. W., Lopez, S. J., & Preacher, K. J.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Gallagher, Matthew W.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07
Volume
77
Issue
4
Pages
1025-1050
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2009481230
Cited by
588
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 26
FWCI
29.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P01AG020166)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
well-being, hedonic well-being, eudaimonic well-being, social well-being, second-order construct, eudaimonia, mental health, latent structure
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Mental Health, Models, Psychological, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review