The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relevance of Big Five Trait Content in Behavior to Subjective Authenticity: Do High Levels of Within‐Person Behavioral Variability Undermine or Enable Authenticity Achievement?
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT Individuals vary their behavior from moment to moment a great deal, often acting “out of character” for their traits. This article investigates the consequences for authenticity. We compared 2 hypotheses—trait consistency, that individuals feel most authentic when acting in a way consistent with their traits; and state‐content significance, that some ways of acting feel more authentic because of their content and consequences, regardless of the actor's corresponding traits. Three studies using experience‐sampling methodology in laboratory and natural settings, with participants ages 18–51, strongly supported the state‐content significance hypothesis and did not support the trait‐consistency hypothesis. Authenticity was consistently associated with acting highly extraverted, agreeable, conscientious, emotionally stable, and intellectual, regardless of the actor's traits. Discussion focuses on possible implications for within‐person variability in behavior and for the nature of the self‐concept.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530
TARGET ARTICLE: Toward a Conceptualization of Optimal Self-Esteem
Kernis, M. H. (2003) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1401_01 · Cited by 1,683 · cited 2×
“Because authenticity predicts a variety of positive psychological outcomes (Harter, 2002; Kernis, 2003; Kernis & Goldman, 2005a; Ryan & Deci, 2004; Sheldon et al., 1997), an implication of these findings is that it might be possible for individuals to improve their mental health by enacting these behavioral contents.”
The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time.
Epstein, S. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1097 · Cited by 1,468
Fleeson, W. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011 · Cited by 1,436
Self-citationHiggins, E. T., Klein, R., & Strauman, T. (1985) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1985.3.1.51 · Cited by 721
Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior
Fleeson, W. (2007) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00458.x · Cited by 455
Self-citationConceptual note on state, trait, and the state-trait distinction
Fridhandler, B. M. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.169 · Cited by 215
Cited by
Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009 · Cited by 839
“Whole Trait Theory starts with the assertion that the descriptive side of traits is best thought of as density distributions of states (Baird, Le, & Lucas, 2006; Fleeson, 2001, 2012; Fleeson & Wilt, 2010; Judge, Simon, Hurst, & Kelley, 2013; Timothy Church et al., 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLehman, D. W., O’Connor, K., Kovács, B., & Newman, G. E. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0047 · Cited by 317
Geukes, K., Nestler, S., Hutteman, R., Küfner, A. C. P., & Back, M. D. (2017) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.003 · Cited by 210
The true self and psychological health: emerging evidence and future directions
Schlegel, R. J., & Hicks, J. A. (2011) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00401.x · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleeson, W., & Wilt, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-05
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1353-1382
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W1930230511
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
