Cited by 455Personality Traits and PsychologyMental Health Research TopicsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior

Fleeson, William·2007·Journal of Personality

Abstract

Two studies investigated whether situations are associated with the manifestation of Big Five trait contents in behavior. Several times per day for 2 or 5 weeks, participants reported their current Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Emotional Stability states and rated the concurrent situation on several characteristics. Multilevel models tested for the average individual's contingency of each Big Five state on each situation characteristic and for whether individuals differed from each other reliably in those contingencies. Results showed that (1) there are psychologically active characteristics of situations on which trait-manifesting behavior is contingent; (2) contingencies on psychologically active characteristics of varying situations are part of the explanation for the sizeable within-person variability in behavior; (3) individuals differ reliably in their contingencies, and such individual differences may partially explain individual differences in amount of variability; and (4) the situation characteristics that are psychologically active differ by trait. These findings suggest that within-person variability in personality states is meaningful and is related to situations, that personality psychology should characterize situations in terms of their relevance to personality states, and that process and individual-difference structure approaches can be integrated in personality psychology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00458.x

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trait personality dispositions relate to personality states in specific situations, but the association is far from perfect.

    “Recent research on personality states has shown that, although individuals' trait personality dispositions relate to their personality states in specific situations, the association is far from perfect (e.g., Fleeson, 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fleeson, W.
Affiliations
Wake Forest University (US)
Corresponding author
Fleeson, William
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-07
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
825-862
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2075403253
Cited by
455
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 19
FWCI
17.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH70571, R01MH070571)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, within-person variability, individual differences, personality psychology, situation characteristics, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, process approach
MeSH terms
Adult, Cooperative Behavior, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interpersonal Relations, Introversion, Psychological, Male, Models, Psychological, Self Concept, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review