Cited by 8Land Rights and ReformsAfrican studies and sociopolitical issuesAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Land Reform in Southern Africa: Myths, Visions and the Harsh Realities of Development and Justice: Review Essay: Land Reform in Southern Africa

Open access
Spierenburg, Marja·2011·Development and Change

Abstract

Africa.Her current research focuses on the role of

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review essay examines land reform in southern Africa, focusing on South Africa's post-apartheid restitution and redistribution programme and Zimbabwe's Fast-Track Land Reform, through the lens of two edited volumes (Walker et al., 2010; Scoones et al., 2010). Spierenburg argues that distrust of small-scale farming is a key factor shaping land policy across the region, and that the Scoones et al. volume's "myth-busting" framing has obscured its own rich, nuanced data.

Key findings

  • In South Africa, only 7 per cent of commercial farmland had been transferred against an initial target of 30 per cent (Cousins and Hall, 2011); the programme has three components — tenure security, redistribution and restitution — with restitution unique in the region and tied to the Native Land Act of 1913.
  • Zimbabwe's post-Independence plans envisaged resettling 162,000 families onto former European land before 1986; by 1998 about 70,000 families had been resettled (Hammar et al., 2003), far below target, with the Lancaster House Agreement ruling out expropriation in the first decade.
  • The Scoones et al. Masvingo study (about 400 households, ten years) found two-thirds of land recipients were "ordinary" Zimbabweans, household investment averaging more than US$2,000 per household, a positive productive dynamic in 40–50 per cent of households, and about 35 per cent "stepping up" and accumulating across fifteen identified livelihood pathways.
  • The essay notes that more than 200,000 displaced farm workers lost jobs and homes, and that the reviewed book largely ignores these human rights violations and the fate of the displaced.

Methods

  • Review essay synthesizing existing literature and two edited volumes on southern African land reform; no primary data collection by the author.
  • Draws on the Walker et al. (2010) volume on South African restitution (contributions by Hall, Mostert, Dhupelia-Mesthrie, Beyers, Sato, De Wet and Mgujulwa, Robins and van der Waal, Derman et al., Ellis, Kepe, Conway and Xipu) and the Scoones et al. (2010) volume on Zimbabwe's Fast-Track Land Reform.
  • Analysis is interpretive and comparative, contrasting justice-versus-development debates and the treatment of small-scale farming across South Africa and Zimbabwe.

Limitations

  • Stated by the paper: the Scoones et al. authors could have reflected more on the generalizability of their findings given their choice of research sites with longstanding contacts; the acceleration of the Kinsey phases is "not really satisfactorily explained"; the effect of household splitting on production in the Communal Areas "does not become clear"; and the book omits the views of those whose land was occupied.
  • Evident from the text: this is a review essay rather than original empirical research, so its claims rest on secondary sources and the author's interpretive reading of the two volumes; the author also notes that research in rural Zimbabwe was difficult and was interrupted during election times.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01736.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 34 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    By the time of writing, only 7 per cent of commercial farmland in South Africa had been transferred, against an initial target of 30 per cent.

    “so far, only 7 per cent of commercial farmland has been transferred, against the initial target of 30 per cent (Cousins and Hall, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cousins and Hall, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    Some restitution cases concern parts of nature conservation areas which retain that function, precluding resettlement.

    “Other cases concern the restitution of parts of nature conservation areas which also retain that function, precluding resettlement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ellis

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kepe

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Robins and Van der Waal

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    In Limpopo Province, restitution beneficiaries have been forced to engage in partnerships with private sector actors and to continue operating plantations and large-scale commercial farms returned to them as such, without any possibility of moving back onto the land.

    “For example, in Limpopo Province, restitution beneficiaries have been forced to engage in partnerships with private sector actors and to continue to operate the plantations and largescale commercial farms returned to them as such, without any possibility of moving back onto the land (contribution by Derman et al.).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Derman et al.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data

    The Scoones et al. data show a lot of variation between and within sites.

    “These data actually show a lot of variation between and within sites.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    By 1998 about 70,000 families had been resettled in Zimbabwe.

    “By 1998 about 70,000 families had been resettled (Hammar et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hammar et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 16
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Sorting out competing restitution claims in South Africa has proved a tremendous task, and settling the claims is taking a long time.

    “Sorting these out has proved to be a tremendous task, and settling the claims is taking a long time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingnone given

    Overall, people in the resettled areas have resorted to a range of on- and off-farm livelihood strategies, including illegal cross-border trading and relying on remittances from relatives abroad, to survive in the context of a largely collapsed economy.

    “Overall, people have resorted to a range of on-and off-farm livelihood strategies, including illegal cross-border trading and relying on remittances from relatives abroad, to survive in the context of a largely collapsed economy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A1 plot users seem to be doing better than A2 plot users, with the latter having a higher percentage of absentee landlords.

    “The A1 plot users seem to be doing better than the A2 plot users, the latter having a higher percentage of absentee landlords.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    External support is important both in lodging and settling restitution claims and in enlisting post-restitution assistance.

    “External support is both important in lodging and settling claims, as several contributions show, but also in enlisting post-restitution assistance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Claimants often constitute heterogeneous groups with members having different interests in the land and different ideas about how to use it.

    “Claimants often constitute heterogeneous groups with members having different interests in the land and different ideas about how to use it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Many restitution cases take a long time to settle, and because no maintenance or investment will take place on claimed land if the outcome is uncertain, beneficiaries receive farms that require a lot of investment to render them productive.

    “The fact that many restitution cases take a long time to settle is not helpful either, since no maintenance or investment will take place on claimed land if the outcome is uncertain; as a result beneficiaries receive farms that require a lot of investment to render them productive.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The history of dispossession in South Africa shows different waves of dispossession, leading in present-day South Africa to competing claims by different groups for the same pieces of land.

    “This history shows the different waves of dispossession, which in present-day South Africa lead to competing claims, with different groups vying for the same pieces of land.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hall

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Increased recognition of customary tenure could be a double-edged sword: while it may facilitate land claims, the idea of 'communities' and people claiming land as a group in many cases evokes stereotypical notions about subsistence farming, leading to questions about levels of productivity.

    “Here, the increased recognition of customary tenure could very well prove to be a double-edged sword.While it may facilitate land claims, the idea of 'communities' and people claiming land as a group in many cases also evoke stereotypical notions about subsistence farming, leading to questions about levels of productivity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The former settler colonies Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe inherited racially skewed patterns of land distribution and each had to address a history of dispossession and the undermining of peasant production.

    “The former settler colonies in the region -Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwehave inherited racially skewed patterns of land distribution, and each has had to find ways to address their history of dispossession and the undermining of peasant production.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Palmer, 1990 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Terreblanche, 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Conflicts with and between traditional authorities claiming ultimate authority over claimed land may delay settlement of restitution claims and complicate decisions about post-restitution land use.

    “These conflicts may delay the settlement of claims, but can also complicate decisions concerning post-restitution land use.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The World Bank conceded that apartheid-era financial support to white-dominated large-scale commercial agriculture might have had perverse effects on productivity and efficiency, and that transferring land from this sector to small-scale farmers could improve agricultural production and contribute to poverty alleviation.

    “They conceded that the (financial) support the white-dominated large-scale commercial agricultural sector received from the apartheid regime might have had perverse effects on the productivity and efficiency of the sector, and that transferring land from this sector to small-scale farmers could improve agricultural production and contribute to poverty alleviation (Deiniger and May, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Deiniger and May, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Restitution claims in South Africa are complicated by various waves of dispossession, with some people having been moved onto land that had been taken from others.

    “Such claims are complicated by the various waves of dispossession, with some being moved onto land that had been taken from others (see e.g. the contribution by De Wet and Mgujulwa).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites De Wet and Mgujulwa

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The research presented in the Scoones et al. book serves to expose these assumptions.

    “The research presented in the book by Scoones et al. does serve to expose these assumptions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The same assumptions about small-scale farmers and peasants have led to land restitution preventing beneficiaries from controlling land use in South Africa, and have had a negative impact on the progress in land redistribution in that country.

    “The same assumptions have led to land restitution preventing beneficiaries from controlling land use in South Africa, and have had a negative impact on the progress in land redistribution in that country.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The land issue was put back on the agenda, and President Mugabe and the ruling party supported the occupation of white-owned farms.

    “The land issue was put back on the agenda, and President Mugabe and the ruling party supported the occupation of white-owned farms (Hellum and Derman, 2004;Scoones et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hellum and Derman, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Scoones et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Towards the end of the 1990s, President Mugabe's popularity seriously dwindled due to steep economic decline, and the authority of ZANU(PF) was challenged by the emergence of the MDC.

    “Towards the end of the 1990s, President Mugabe's popularity seriously dwindled due to (among other things) steep economic decline, and the authority of the ruling party ZANU(PF) was challenged by the emergence of a widely supported opposition party, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) (see e.g.Hammar et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hammar et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A number of authors have argued that the most important reason for the slackening pace of land transfers in Zimbabwe was a lack of faith in the production capacity of small-scale farmers, and a desire to assuage the worries of international and local investors.

    “A number of authors, however, have argued that the most important reason for the slackening pace of land transfers was a lack of faith in the production capacity of small-scale farmers, and a desire to assuage the worries of international and local investors (Moyo, 2000;Scoones et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Moyo, 2000 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Scoones et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    By mid-July 2000, the Fast-Track Land Reform Programme was announced, with the state retrospectively trying to impose a policy on the confusion and regain control over the allocation of land.

    “By mid-July of that year, the Fast-Track Land Reform Programme was announced, with the state retrospectively trying to impose a policy on the confusion and regain control over the allocation of land (Scoones et al., 2010: 24).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Scoones et al., 2010: 24

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The myths that the Scoones et al. authors set out to debunk are often based on erroneous assumptions about small-scale farmers and peasants.

    “The myths they set out to debunk are often based on erroneous assumptions about small-scale farmers and peasants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The land occupations started in early 2000 accompanied by widespread violence against white farmers and anyone suspected of supporting the MDC.

    “The land occupations started in early 2000 accompanied by widespread violence -against white farmers but also against anyone suspected of supporting the MDC -receiving a lot of attention from the media (Hammar et al., 2003;Hellum and Derman, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hammar et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hellum and Derman, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

20 of 20
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    South Africa's land reform programme followed most of the World Bank's principles.

    “The programme followed most of the World Bank's principles, but also contains a restitution component.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Seventeen years after South Africa's first democratic elections, there is much discontent concerning the land reform programme.

    “Seventeen years after the first democratic elections in South Africa, there is much discontent concerning the land reform programme the post-apartheid government embarked upon.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In March 2007 the South African government announced that 90 per cent of all restitution claims had been processed, but many of these, especially in urban settings, were resolved through payments rather than restitution of land.

    “The government responded and in March 2007 it announced that 90 per cent of all claims had been processed, but many of these -especially in urban settings -have been resolved through payments rather than the restitution of land.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Between 1980 and 2000, resettlement occurred through a relatively organised process, with the government purchasing available properties on a willing-seller, willing-buyer basis, or later by compulsory acquisition.

    “Between 1980 and 2000, resettlement occurred through a relatively organised process, with the government purchasing available properties on a willing-seller, willing-buyer basis, or later by compulsory acquisition (Spierenburg, 2011).”

    From The impact of land reform on the status of large carnivores in Zimbabwe (2016) · cites this paper as Spierenburg, 2011

    The paper’s Zimbabwe land-reform discussion (indexed as Abstract; page unavailable) says that after independence in 1980 the government planned resettlement, had resettled about 70,000 families by 1998, and acquired land on a willing-seller–willing-buyer basis during the first decade. It does not say that compulsory acquisition later formed part of the 1980–2000 resettlement process, or explicitly characterize that entire period as relatively organised. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Claassens, 2008, Land, Power & Custom
  2. Deininger, 1999, The World Bank Research Observer, 14, 247
  3. Mandivamba, 2006, Zimbabwe's Agricultural Revolution Revisited
  4. Ntsebeza, 2007, Land Reform in South Africa: The Challenge of Transformation and Redistribution, 107
  5. Sachikonye, 2003, Report prepared for the Catholic Institute of International Relations and the Farm Community Trust of Zimbabwe

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spierenburg, M.
Affiliations
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Spierenburg, Marja
Venue
Development and Change
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
1473-1481
ISSN
0012-155X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1842873755
Cited by
8
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development and Change (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African studies and sociopolitical issues
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
land reform, land redistribution, development, social justice, Southern Africa, land tenure, agricultural transformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review