Land Reform in Developing Countries: Property Rights and Property Wrongs
Abstract
Land reforms are laws that are intended, and likely, to cut poverty by raising the poor’s share of land rights. That raises questions about property rights as old as moral philosophy, and issues of efficiency and fairness that dominate policy from Bolivia to Nepal. Classic reforms directly transfer land from rich to poor. However, much else has been marketed as land reform: the restriction of tenancy, but also its de-restriction; collectivisation, but also de-collectivisation; land consolidation, but also land division. In 1955-2000, genuine land reform affected over a billion people, and almost as many hectares. Is land reform still alive, for example in Bolivia, South Africa and Nepal? Or is it dead and, if so, is this because it has succeeded, or because it has failed? There has been massive research on land reform and this book builds on some surprising findings. Small farms’ share in land is rising in most of Asia and Africa. This is not driven (as widely claimed) by growth in rural population or farm productivity, but by the relative efficiency of small farms, and in some cases by land reform. Whether land reform helps the poor depends not only on land transfers, but at least as much on its effects through employment, non-farm activity, GDP growth and distribution, as well as the village status and power of the poor. Avoidance, evasion and even distortion of land reform laws sometimes advance their main aims. Liberalisation and its accompaniments (such as supermarkets) can be powerful friends or fatal foes of small farms and land reform. This book will be of great interest to students, researchers and consultants working on agriculture, farm organisation, rural development and poverty reduction, with special emphasis on developing countries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Misgivings about small-scale farming influence land reform policies in many countries, despite growing evidence of smallholder productivity.
“Various scholars have noted that the misgivings that prevail about small-scale farming influence land (reform) policies in many countries (Hughes, 2006;Scott, 1998), despite growing evidence of small holder productivity (Lipton, 2009).”
From Land Reform in Southern Africa: Myths, Visions and the Harsh Realities of Development and Justice: Review Essay: Land Reform in Southern Africa (2011) · cites this paper as Lipton, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals
White, B., Borras Jr., S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & Wolford, W. (2012) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.691879 · Cited by 913 · see citing works
“…rural bias debate between Byres and Lipton (Kay 2009, 109-115) and which intersect with more specific arguments on the so-called ‘inverse relationship’ between farm size and productivity (see also Byres 2004, Bernstein 2010, Griffin et al 2002, Lipton 2009, Hazell et al. 2010, Wiggins et al. 2010).”
BackgroundAnderson, C. R., Bruil, J., Chappell, M. J., Kiss, C., & Pimbert, M. P. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11195272 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Africa's changing farm size distribution patterns: the rise of medium‐scale farms
Jayne, T. S., Chamberlin, J., Traub, L., Sitko, N. J., Muyanga, M. C., Yeboah, F. K., Anseeuw, W., Chapoto, A., Wineman, A., Nkonde, C., et al. (2016) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/agec.12308 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
“…Asia and most other agricultural growth successes have occurred with steadily rising absolute numbers of rural and agricultural populations for extended periods of time, with Asia’s rural population only having begun to decline very recently (Bezemer and Hazell, 2006; Lipton, 2009, p. 100).”
BackgroundInfluentialChallenges posed by the new wave of farmland investment
Deininger, K. (2011) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.559007 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
“Unless they are disadvantaged by policy distortions in favor of large farms (Binswanger et al. 1995b), they will produce more efficiently than wage labor-based operations, which need to spend resources supervising workers (Allen and Lueck 1998, Binswanger and Deininger 1997, Lipton 2009).”
BackgroundHall, R., Scoones, I., & Tsikata, D. (2017) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1263187 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
“Debates continue about the relative merits of large and small farms, their implications for labour absorption, rural livelihoods and growth in Africa’s farm sector (Lipton 2009; World Bank 2008; Collier and Dercon 2014; cf. Deininger and Byerlee 2011; Baglioni and Gibbon 2013).”
BackgroundThe rise of large farms in land abundant countries: Do they have a future?
Byerlee, D., & Deininger, K. (2011) · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-5588 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
“While there is little evidence of significant recent changes in agrarian structure in land scarce countries (Lipton 2009), many land-abundant countries are characterized by rising investment in large-scale farming based on a nonfamily corporate model, a trend that can but need not be accompanied by…”
InfluentialSheng, Y., Ding, J., & Huang, J. (2018) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aay104 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
“An inversed farm size–productivity relationship is widely observed in developing Asian countries (Bardhan 1973; Sen 1975; Heltberg 1998; Lipton 2009; Hayami 2001, 2009), following the notion of “small is beautiful” initially observed by Chayanov (first published in Russia 1925, see Chaia_nov 1986).”
Food insecurity, income inequality, and the changing comparative advantage in world agriculture
Otsuka, K. (2013) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/agec.12046 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Collective Land Ownership in the 21st Century: Overview of Global Trends
Wily, L. A. (2018) · Land · doi:10.3390/land7020068 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
What Drives the Global “Land Rush”?
Arezki, R., Deininger, K., & Selod, H. (2013) · The World Bank Economic Review · doi:10.1093/wber/lht034 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Re-thinking agrarian reform, land and territory in La Via Campesina
Rosset, P. M. (2013) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2013.826654 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
“While issues of agrarian reform, land and territory have been with us for much longer (Sobhan 1993, Rosset et al. 2006, Lipton 2009), this GV focuses on the past two decades of struggle, since the founding of LVC as a © 2013 Taylor & Francis 1Page 33 of this Grassroots Voices.”
BackgroundEllis, F. (2012) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2011.625408 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
“…ofMichael Lipton’s work over four decades has been the crucial role of productivity gains in small-farm agriculture for rural poverty reduction (Lipton, 1977, 2009; IFAD, 2001), there are many sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries in which such productivity gains have stubbornly refused to…”
BackgroundThe future of small farms in Asia
Otsuka, K., Liu, Y., & Yamauchi, F. (2016) · Development Policy Review · doi:10.1111/dpr.12159 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“2 1 Introduction Many studies have found an inverse relationship between farm size and productivity in South Asia, indicating that small farms are more efficient than large farms (for example, Heltberg, 1998; Lipton, 2009).”
Contested paradigms of ‘viability’ in redistributive land reform: perspectives from southern Africa
Cousins, B., & Scoones, I. (2010) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150903498739 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
“In this version of land reform the major beneficiaries should be efficient, smallscale farmers, who are enabled by appropriate rural development policies to maximise returns of land and contribute to rural non-farm economic growth (Lipton 2009).”
Backgroundde Janvry, A., Gonzalez-Navarro, M., & Sadoulet, É. (2013) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.04.003 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
The continuing debate about urban bias
Jones, G. A., & Corbridge, S. (2010) · Progress in Development Studies · doi:10.1177/146499340901000101 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
“Lipton makes important points about the nature of the state in the Third World, and his arguments about the pro-poor effectiveness of land-to-the-tiller reforms have an obvious contemporary relevance (see also Lipton, 2009).”
BackgroundUnderstanding Land Reform in Ghana
Obeng‐Odoom, F. (2015) · Review of Radical Political Economics · doi:10.1177/0486613415603161 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“There is a huge literature on the definition of land reform, spawning prescriptive, descriptive, and purposive interpretations (see Lipton 2009: 323-330).”
BackgroundLand Inequality and Rural Unrest
Albertus, M., Brambor, T., & Ceneviva, R. (2018) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002716654970 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“Note: The data for landholding inequality come from Lipton (2009), the Food and Agriculture Organization’s World Census of Agriculture, Brazil’s national statistics agency, Deininger and Squire (1996), and the US Agency for International Development.”
MethodLand Reform and Civil Conflict: Theory and Evidence from Peru
Albertus, M. (2019) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12466 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“Such programs account for 85% of all major land reforms since 1900 (Albertus 2015) and have affected roughly 1.5 billion people since World War I (Lipton 2009, 1).”
BackgroundInfluentialLand Tenure, Tenure Security and Farm Efficiency: Panel Evidence from the Philippines
Michler, J. D., & Shively, G. (2014) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12082 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“At that time between 8.5 and 11 million rural workers remained landless (Lipton, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialFaguet, J.-P., Sánchez, F., & Villaveces, M.-J. (2020) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105036 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Meier, T., Christen, O., Semler, E., Jahreis, G., Voget-Kleschin, L., Schrode, A., & Artmann, M. (2013) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.006 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“…effective policies – like land reforms but also nutrition and environmental policies – that are pro-poor, connecting community and household foodbased strategies with fair distribution schemes of property rights and a regulated access to natural resources (Lipton, 2009; Wahlqvist et al., 2012).”
BackgroundOptions for African agriculture in an era of high food and energy prices
Hazell, P. (2013) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/agec.12047 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Changing Farm Size Distributions and Agricultural Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa
Jayne, T. S., Wineman, A., Chamberlin, J., Muyanga, M. C., & Yeboah, F. K. (2022) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-111220-025657 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Capitalising on the Irish land question: land reform and state banking in Ireland, 1891–1938
Foley-Fisher, N. C., & McLaughlin, E. (2016) · Financial History Review · doi:10.1017/s0968565016000019 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Land Inequality Trends and Drivers
Wegerif, M. C. A., & Guereña, A. (2020) · Land · doi:10.3390/land9040101 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Economic Effects of the Abolition of Serfdom: Evidence from the Russian EmpirePreprint
Markevich, A., & Zhuravskaya, E. V. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2514964 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Growing Resource Scarcity and Global Farmland Investment
Byerlee, D., & Deininger, K. (2013) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-091912-151849 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
The State of the World's Arable Land
Olsson, L., Cotrufo, F., Crews, T. E., Franklin, J., King, A. E., Mirzabaev, A., Scown, M., Tengberg, A. E., Villarino, S. H., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-113741 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Does ‘Landlordism’ Still Matter? Reflections on Agrarian Change in I ndia
Harriss, J. (2013) · Journal of Agrarian Change · doi:10.1111/joac.12024 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Land Inequality and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis
Cipollina, M., Cuffaro, N., & D’Agostino, G. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10124655 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Factor Market Activity and the Inverse Farm Size-Productivity Relationship in Tanzania
Wineman, A., & Jayne, T. S. (2020) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2020.1797686 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“In fact, the IR has served as justification for land reforms in developing countries (Lipton 2009), and further serves to motivate a strategic focus on smallholders within agricultural development policy (Larson et al. 2014).”
BackgroundLisk, F. (2013) · The Pacific Review · doi:10.1080/09512748.2013.842314 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“…form of regulation of land deals based on principles embedded in the constructs of good governance at both national and international levels, and aimed at protecting land owners rights in both a free market system and under customary law and traditional system in land transactions (Lipton, 2009).”
BackgroundLand Sector Reforms in Ghana, Kenya and Vietnam: A Comparative Analysis of Their Effectiveness
Narh, P., Lambini, C., Sabbi, M., Pham, V., & Nguyen, T. (2016) · Land · doi:10.3390/land5020008 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Pedersen, R. H. (2012) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2011.635202 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“One group of scholars tends to focus on insecurity of tenure as a major impediment to economic growth, recommending formal titling, emphasising reformist intentions and often referring to success stories in Asia (de Soto, 2000; Lipton, 2009: 8; Hanstad et al., 2007: 29).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe decline and transformation of smallholders in Chinese agriculture: national trends
Zhang, Q. F., & Wu, M. (2024) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2024.2392688 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“…or at least correlate with, some other shared characteristics, ranging from low degree of farm intensification and commercialization, a subsistence orientation, low income, and higher yield per unit of land, to a policy preference for redis-tributive land reforms (Hazell et al. 2010; Lipton 2009).”
Modern Value Chains and the Organization of Agrarian Production
Henderson, H., & Isaac, A. G. (2016) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aaw092 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“19 In the five-fold categorization of developing countries of Lipton (2009), the average Gini for the 19 countries in his most unequal groups (I and II) can be computed as 0.82, using his data.”
InfluentialLand Tenure Transitions in the Global South: Trends, Drivers, and Policy Implications
Rudel, T. K., & Hernandez, M. (2017) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060924 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Murtazashvili, J. B., & Murtazashvili, I. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108642217 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Too many workers or not enough land? The experience of land reform in Spain during the 1930s
Simpson, J., & Carmona, J. (2017) · Historia Agraria Revista de agricultura e historia rural · doi:10.26882/histagrar.072e02s · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“However, economic development in Spain by the 1930s perhaps had reached a level where there was no longer a clear inverse-relationship between farm size and land productivity, and capital requirements was becoming increasingly important (Lipton, 2009: 65)69.”
BackgroundImportance of Smallholder Farms as a Relevant Strategy to Increase Food Security
Hazell, P. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42148-9_3 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Lipton (2009) reports changes between censuses for selected countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) (Table 1).”
BackgroundLand Governance, Gender Equality and Development: Past Achievements and Remaining Challenges
Ravnborg, H. M., Spichiger, R., Broegaard, R. B., et al. (2016) · Journal of International Development · doi:10.1002/jid.3215 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“More recently, this initial focus has been expanded to also include the recognition of customary tenure and customary authorities and, in a number of countries, towards the registration—and thus formalisation—of customary rights both on a collective and on an individual basis (e.g. EU Task Force on Land Tenure, 2004;…”
BackgroundInfluentialRedistributive Land Reform and Structural Change in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan
İşcan, T. (2017) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aax093 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Lipton (2009) argues that land reform continues to be relevant in many societies.”
BackgroundImpact of Land Certification on Sustainable Land Use Practices: Case of Gozamin District, Ethiopia
Mengesha, A. K., Mansberger, R., Damyanovic, D., et al. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11205551 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Un‐yielding: Evidence for the agriculture transformation we need
Chaplin‐Kramer, R., Chappell, M. J., & Bennett, E. M. (2022) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14950 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Murtazashvili, I., & Murtazashvili, J. (2016) · Conflict Security and Development · doi:10.1080/14678802.2016.1153314 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
A Food in Health Security (FIHS) platform in the Asia-Pacific Region: the way forward.
Wahlqvist, M. L., Keatinge, J. D. H., Butler, C. D., et al. (2009) · PubMed · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Rudel, T. K., Kwon, O., Paul, B. K., Boval, M., Rao, I. M., Burbano, D. V., McGroddy, M., Lerner, A. M., White, D. S., Cuchillo-Hilario, M., et al. (2016) · Land · doi:10.3390/land5010006 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
A Less Gendered Access to Land? The Impact of Tanzania's New Wave of Land Reform
Pedersen, R. H. (2015) · Development Policy Review · doi:10.1111/dpr.12121 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Land management and sustainable use of land resources in the case of Burkina Faso
Bazame, R., Tanrıvermiş, H., & Kapusuz, Y. E. (2018) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.3247 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“…systems of these countries and in developing countries generally (Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO], 2002; the World Bank [WB], 2002; Deininger, 2003; Bonfiglioli, 2004; FAO, 2008a, 2008b; Nkonya et al., 2008; Lipton, 2009; Liniger, Studer, Hauert, & Gurtner, 2011; Byamugisha, 2013).”
Conversion of land use and household livelihoods in Vietnam: A study in Nghe An
Nguyen, T. T. (2021) · Open Agriculture · doi:10.1515/opag-2021-0010 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“It is also true of the early stages of socialist land reform in China, Vietnam, Ethiopia, and Cuba (Lipton 2010).”
BackgroundLand leasing in a post-land reform context: insights from Zimbabwe
Mudimu, G. T., Zuo, T., Shah, A. A., et al. (2020) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-020-10219-y · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Authoritarian Survival and Poverty Traps: Land Reform in MexicoPreprint
Albertus, M., Díaz-Cayeros, A., Magaloni, B., et al. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2175088 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Informal land leasing in rural India persists because it is credible
Goyal, Y., Choudhury, P., & Ghosh, R. (2022) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106299 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Property Rights and Gender Bias: Evidence from Land Reform in West Bengal
Bhalotra, S. R., Chakravarty, A., Mookherjee, D., et al. (2019) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20160262 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“During 1955-2000 a billion people and nearly as many hectares were affected by land reform (Lipton, 2009).”
Asongu, S. A., & Kodila‐Tedika, O. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2563769 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“According to Arezki et al. (2013), a debate underlying the rush draws on agricultural production structure that articulates the need for smallholder structure for poverty reduction initiatives (World Bank 2007; Lipton, 2009).”
BackgroundSimpson, J., & Carmona, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108766999 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
When Tradition Meets Modernity in Land Registration: Evidence from Dagbon, Ghana
Edwin, D. A., Glover, E. K., & Glover, E. K. (2020) · Land · doi:10.3390/land9110416 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Does Sharecropping Affect Long‐term Investment? Evidence from West Bengal's Tenancy Reforms
Deininger, K., Jin, S., & Yadav, V. (2013) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aat001 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Land Reform in the Republic of South Africa: Social Justice or Populism?
Żukowski, A. (2017) · Werkwinkel · doi:10.1515/werk-2017-0005 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Land Reform in the Era of Global Warming—Can Land Reforms Help Agriculture Be Climate-Smart?
Rampa, A., Gadanakis, Y., & Rose, G. (2020) · Land · doi:10.3390/land9120471 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Institutional Framework of (In)Action Against Land Degradation
Baumgartner, P., & Cherlet, J. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19168-3_3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“The inverse farm-size-productivity relationship (Lamb 2003; Lipton 2009) has shown that small-scale farmers invest more in labour intensive land management than large-scale farmers.”
BackgroundDeininger, K., Nizalov, D., & Singh, S. K. (2016) · The World Bank Economic Review · doi:10.1093/wber/lhw063 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“The negative relationship between productivity and farm size, first noted in Russia (Chayanov 1926) and India (Bardhan 1973; Sen 1975; Srinivasan 1972), has almost become a stylized fact in the literature (Eastwood et al. 2010; Lipton 2009).”
BackgroundLand Tenure Reforms, Poverty and Natural Resource Management: Conceptual Framework
Holden, S. T., Otsuka, K., & Deininger, K. (2013) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137343819_1 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Lipton (2009) argues that conventional land redistribution remains an important policy option in cases where massive unemployment exists in combination with highly inequitable land distributions.”
BackgroundTwists and turns of land reform in Latin America: From predatory to intermediate states?
Rodríguez, E. B., & Esteban, Á. L. G. (2021) · Journal of Agrarian Change · doi:10.1111/joac.12421 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Trophy lands: why elites acquire land and why it matters
Geisler, C. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement · doi:10.1080/02255189.2015.1041881 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“The impacts stemming from the loss of public, common and collective land are both social and ecological (Lipton 2009; Lyimo 2011).”
BackgroundSmall Farms: Changing Structures and Roles in Economic DevelopmentPreprint
von Braun, J., & Mirzabaev, A. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2672900 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Moreover, the envisaged outcome behind land reforms targeted at securing land rights need to be poverty reduction and enhancing the food security among the rural poor (Lipton 2009), preventing potential “elite capture” which may defeat the purpose of securing land rights for smallholders.”
BackgroundInfluentialState-Society Dynamics in Contemporary Brazilian Land Reform
Wolford, W. (2016) · Latin American Perspectives · doi:10.1177/0094582x15623768 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Kroncke, J. J. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2231285 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Who will make the ‘best’ use of Africa’s land? Lessons from Zimbabwe
Manjengwa, J., Hanlon, J., & Smart, T. (2014) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.907722 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Tanzania's land law reform; the implementation challenge.
Pedersen, R. H. (2010) · Econstor (Econstor) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Income inequality among agricultural households in India: A regression‐based decomposition analysis
Das, R., & Srivastava, R. (2021) · Review of Development Economics · doi:10.1111/rode.12758 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Land reform by default: uncovering patterns of agricultural decollectivization in Tajikistan
Hierman, B., & Nekbakhtshoev, N. (2017) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1249366 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Furthermore, by concentrating on cotton-growing districts, we control for the possibility that certain crops may exhibit more significant economies of scale than others (Meurs 2001; Lipton 2009).”
BackgroundFarm Transition and Indigenous Growth: The Rise to Medium- and Large-Scale Farming in GhanaPreprint
Houssou, N., Chapoto, A., & Asante‐Addo, C. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2740458 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The Rise of Large Farms in Land-Abundant Countries: Do They Have a Future?
Byerlee, D., & Deininger, K. (2013) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137343819_14 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Villamizar, J. C. (2018) · Ciencia Política · doi:10.15446/cp.v12n25.65251 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Farmland Acquisition and Household Livelihoods in Hanoi's Peri-Urban Areas
Tran, Q. T. (2013) · Research Commons (University of Waikato) · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Donor-driven land reform in Cambodia – Property rights, planning, and land value taxation
Thiel, F. (2010) · Erdkunde · doi:10.3112/erdkunde.2010.03.02 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Since 1992, economic concessions have been awarded to 65 companies, many with close connections to the ruling party (lipTon 2009).”
BackgroundNew Left Regimes in the Andes? Ecuador in Comparative Perspective
North, L. (2013) · Studies in Political Economy · doi:10.1080/19187033.2013.11674984 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
An economic evaluation of SPREAD on Rwanda’s rural population
Moss, C. B., Lyambabaje, A., & Oehmke, J. F. (2016) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2016.1265076 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Supporters of the value chain approach contend that smallholder physical productivity can meet or exceed large-scale productivity (Lipton 2009; Eastwood, Lipton, and Newell 2010; Carletto, Savastano, and Zezza 2013, Pinstrup-Andersen 2015), that significant amounts of smallholder income is…”
BackgroundWhat Drives the Global Land Rush?
Selod, H., Deininger, K., & Arezki, R. (2011) · IMF Working Paper · doi:10.5089/9781463923334.001 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The Role of Property Rights in the Debate on Large-Scale Land Acquisitions
Schutter, O. D. (2015) · International development policy/Revue internationale de politique de développement · doi:10.4000/poldev.2026 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Segal-Halevi, E. (2018) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-022-09545-x · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Some books on land reform are Powelson (1988); Bernstein (2002); Rosset et al. (2006); Lipton (2009).”
BackgroundInitial Insights on Land Adjudication in a Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration
Lengoiboni, M., Richter, C., van Asperen, P., et al. (2021) · Land · doi:10.3390/land10040414 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Asongu, S. A., & Nwachukwu, J. C. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2563766 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Consistent with World Bank (2007),Lipton (2009) and Arezki et al. (2013), the underlying rush needs to provide some guarantee for initiatives favouring smallholder structures of agriculture which are friendlier towards poverty alleviation.”
Wegerif, M. C. A., Coulibaly, M., & Ouedraogo, H. M. G. (2025) · Land · doi:10.3390/land14040671 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The Right to Land: To Whom Belongs after a Reconciliation Law in Egypt
Soliman, A. M. (2022) · Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs · doi:10.25034/ijcua.2022.v6n2-1 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“The most important is the organized squatter acquisition by relatively large groups (Lipton, 2009), a phenomenon most found in Latin America.”
BackgroundDoes wealth inequality reduce the gains from trade?
Caselli, M. (2012) · Review of World Economics · doi:10.1007/s10290-012-0119-0 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“4 Using land inequality as a proxy for wealth inequality may be criticised on the grounds that, if land is heterogeneous in terms of productivity, a competitive land rental market and free entry will lead to land inequality but no wealth inequality because lower-productivity land will be concentrated into larger holdi…”
MethodResultAgrarian Relations, Institutions, and Land Reform in Nepal
Adhikari, J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-32-9648-0_17 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Proposing a farm assessment toolkit: evaluating a South African land reform case study
Verschoor, A.-J., Gandidzanwa, C., Newby, T., Collett, A., & Venter, S. (2023) · Agrekon · doi:10.1080/03031853.2023.2279159 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Biddulph, R., & Hillbom, E. (2020) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104830 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Analyzing the Changes of the Meaning of Customary Land in the Context of Land Grabbing in Malawi
Bae, Y. J. (2021) · Land · doi:10.3390/land10080836 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
TIERRAS EN EL POSCONFLICTO: ¿EN EL FONDO CUÁL ES EL PROBLEMA?
Sanín, F. A. G., & Jaramillo, M. M. (2018) · Análisis Político · doi:10.15446/anpol.v31n92.71095 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The policy–practice gap: A comment on South Africa’s land redistribution
Zantsi, S., & Nengovhela, R. (2024) · Development in Practice · doi:10.1080/09614524.2024.2309576 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“…countries with extreme land inequality (e.g. South Africa) tend also to have extreme income inequality, which makes poverty reduction harder by skewing growth away from the poor, and by reducing their political in fl uence (Binswanger-Mkhize, Bourguignon, and van den Brink 2009; Lipton 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialLa reforma agraria: la paz con las FARC, un compromiso aplazado de nuevo
Villamizar, J. C. (2020) · Anuario Colombiano de Historia Social y de la Cultura · doi:10.15446/achsc.v47n1.83151 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Jacobs, S. (2013) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392113486660 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Spierenburg, M. (2011) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01736.x · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Various scholars have noted that the misgivings that prevail about small-scale farming influence land (reform) policies in many countries (Hughes, 2006; Scott, 1998), despite growing evidence of small holder productivity (Lipton, 2009).”
BackgroundAccess and allocation in food governance, a decadal view 2008–2018
Azizi, D. (2020) · International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-020-09481-9 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“However, poverty reduction and rural development may be less dependent on land reform, but rather on liberal macro-economic policies and access to health and education for larger population groups (Lipton 2009).”
BackgroundLand Accumulation Dynamics in Developing Country Agriculture
Henderson, H., Corral, L., Simning, E., et al. (2015) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2014.989993 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Such inequality has also been found to mitigate the poverty-reducing effects of existing growth, as assetimpoverished households commonly lack the capacity to make productive investments (Deininger & Squire, 1998; Lipton, 2009; Ravallion & Datt, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialFeldman, S., & Biggs, S. (2012) · Integrated science & technology program · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4485-1_2 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lipton, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lipton, Michael
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2009-06-24
- OpenAlex
- W2798728184
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 10.50
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Keywords
- land reform, property rights, land redistribution, smallholder farming, poverty reduction, rural development, land tenure, land consolidation, land division, collectivization, rural employment, off-farm activities, developing countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review