Cited by 83Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPsychological and Temporal Perspectives Research

The development of prudence in the face of varying future rewards

Lemmon, Karen, Moore, Chris·2007·Developmental Science

Abstract

The choice to delay gratification, opting for a greater reward later instead of a smaller reward now, has been used as a measure of preschoolers’ ability to make future‐oriented decisions. The present studies investigated to what extent these choice tasks reflect children's ability to make choices in favour of their future self. In Experiment 1, preschoolers were presented with choices between a smaller immediate reward of one sticker and larger delayed rewards varying in amount from two to five stickers. Whereas 3‐year‐olds showed no increased tendency to choose the delayed option as quantity increased from two to five, 4‐year‐olds’ future‐oriented choices reflected the value of the delayed reward. In Experiment 2, preschoolers chose between immediate and delayed rewards that were equal in amount and varied between one and four stickers. Three‐year‐olds reliably chose the immediate reward and showed no differentiation among rewards, whereas 4‐year‐olds chose in a manner that suggested they were trying to satisfy both immediate and future desires. Together these results support the notion that future‐oriented prudence reflects growth in concern for the future self.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00603.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When choosing between immediate and delayed gratification, 3-year-olds are unlikely to wait even when the delayed reward is significantly more appealing than the immediate reward.

    “When there is a choice between an immediate or delayed gratification, 3-year-olds are unlikely to wait even when the delayed reward is significantly more appealing than the immediate reward (Lemmon & Moore, 2007).”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Lemmon & Moore, 2007

  • In contrast, 4-year-olds are able to resist immediate gratification for a greater reward.

    “In contrast, 4-year-olds are able to resist immediate gratification for a greater reward.”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Lemmon & Moore, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lemmon, K., & Moore, C.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-05
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
502-511
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W2023643874
Cited by
83
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Society for Research in Child Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
Keywords
delay of gratification, prudence, future self, preschool children, delayed rewards, immediate versus delayed rewards, future-oriented decision-making, reward magnitude
MeSH terms
Child Development, Child, Preschool, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Reward

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review