Cited by 25Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Visual recognition memory across contexts

Open access
Jones, Emily J.H., Pascalis, Olivier, Eacott, Madeline J., Herbert, Jane S.·2011·Developmental Science

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated the development of representational flexibility in visual recognition memory during infancy using the Visual Paired Comparison (VPC) task. In Experiment 1, 6- and 9-month-old infants exhibited recognition when familiarization and test occurred in the same room, but showed no evidence of recognition when familiarization and test occurred in different rooms. In contrast, 12- and 18-month-old infants exhibited recognition irrespective of testing room. Thus, flexibility across a change of room was observed at a younger age than flexibility across a change of background that has previously been seen with the VPC procedure (Robinson & Pascalis, 2004). To determine if limitations in representational flexibility across a change of background could be overcome by experiences during encoding, in Experiment 2, 6-, 9-, 12- and 18-month-old infants were familiarized with a picture on multiple backgrounds. At all ages, infants showed recognition across a change in background at test. These findings indicate that dissociating an item from its context during encoding may be an important factor in understanding the representational flexibility of visual recognition memory in infancy. Developmental changes in representational flexibility are likely driven by changes in the functional maturity of the hippocampal formation, and experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00964.x

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the present study, a normative sample of low-risk typically developing infants and infants from low and high-risk groups who did not later develop ASD showed a longer peak look to faces than objects, decreased peak look duration over the first year, and dishabituated to a novel face or an object after delays of up to a minute.

    “Consistent with previous work, in the present study, a normative sample of low-risk typically developing infants and infants from low and high-risk groups who did not later develop ASD showed a longer peak look to faces than objects [63], decreased peak look duration over the first year [75], and dishabituated to a novel face or an object after delays of up to a minute [76].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, E. J. H., Pascalis, O., Eacott, M. J., & Herbert, J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition (FR)
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Herbert, Jane S.
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-20
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
136-147
ISSN
1363-755X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108589564
Cited by
25
References
89
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
visual recognition memory, representational flexibility, context sensitivity, background change
MeSH terms
Association, Child Development, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Infant, Male, Memory, Visual Perception, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review