Cited by 1,312Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach

Norman, Kenneth A., O'Reilly, Randall C.·2003·Psychological Review

Abstract

The authors present a computational neural-network model of how the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe cortex (MTLC) contribute to recognition memory. The hippocampal component contributes by recalling studied details. The MTLC component cannot support recall, but one can extract a scalar familiarity signal from MTLC that tracks how well a test item matches studied items. The authors present simulations that establish key differences in the operating characteristics of the hippocampal-recall and MTLC-familiarity signals and identify several manipulations (e.g., target-lure similarity, interference) that differentially affect the 2 signals. They also use the model to address the stochastic relationship between recall and familiarity and the effects of partial versus complete hippocampal lesions on recognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.110.4.611

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norman, K. A., & O'Reilly, R. C.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2003-10
Volume
110
Issue
4
Pages
611-646
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2100377190
Cited by
1,312
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 84
FWCI
17.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH12582, MH-47566, F32MH012582, P01MH047566)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
recognition memory, hippocampus, complementary learning systems, familiarity, memory retrieval, hippocampal lesions, interference, neural network model
MeSH terms
Cerebral Cortex, Hippocampus, Humans, Learning, Memory, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review