Cited by 211Child Nutrition and Water AccessEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Socioeconomic gradients and child development in a very low income population: evidence from Madagascar

Fernald, Lia C.H., Weber, Ann, Galasso, Emanuela, Ratsifandrihamanana, Lisy·2011·Developmental Science

Abstract

Our objectives were to document and examine socioeconomic gradients across a comprehensive set of child development measures in a population living in extreme poverty, and to interpret these gradients in light of findings from the neuroscience literature. We assessed a nationally representative sample of 3–6‐year‐old children (n = 1332) from 150 communities of Madagascar using standard tests of development. We found that children whose families were in the top wealth quintile or whose mothers had secondary education performed significantly better across almost all measures of cognitive and language development and had better linear growth compared with children of women in the lowest wealth quintile or women with no education. These differences between children of low and high socioeconomic position were greatest for receptive language, working memory, and memory of phrases. The mean difference in the scores between children in the highest and lowest socioeconomic status categories doubled between age 3 and age 6, and the biggest gaps across socioeconomic position by age 6 were in receptive language and sustained attention. Our results suggest that even within the context of extreme poverty, there are strong associations between family socioeconomic status and child development outcomes among preschool children, and that the language and executive function domains exhibit the largest gradients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01032.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Socioeconomic status gaps in student achievement reported in the literature might be underestimated.

    “our findings suggest that the socioeconomic status (SES) gaps in student achievement reported in the literature might be underestimated (Fernald et al., 2011; Schady et al., 2015; Hervé et al., 2022)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernald, L. C. H., Weber, A., Galasso, E., & Ratsifandrihamanana, L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • World Bank (US)
  • Catholic University of Madagascar (MG)
Corresponding author
Fernald, Lia C.H.
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-24
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
832-847
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W1630936264
Cited by
211
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
social gradient, child development, extreme poverty, preschool children, cognitive development, language development, receptive language, working memory, executive function, sustained attention, maternal education, family wealth, linear growth, Madagascar
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Language Development, Madagascar, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Poverty, Socioeconomic Factors, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review