Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 391

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An empirical investigation of students' behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites

Chang, Su‐Chao, Tung, Feng‐Cheng·2008·British Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

With the development of the Internet in the era of knowledge‐driven economy, e‐learning is experiencing rapid growth. The online learning course websites are drawing more attention as well. This research combines the innovation diffusion theory and the technology acceptance model, and adds two research variables, perceived system quality and computer self‐efficacy to propose a new hybrid technology acceptance model to study students' behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites. This research finds that compatibility, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived system quality and computer self‐efficacy were critical factors for students' behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites. By explaining students' behavioural intentions from a user's perspective, the findings of this research help to develop more user‐friendly websites and also provide insight into the best way to promote new e‐learning tools for students.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00742.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Bentler P. M., 1989, EQS structural equations program manual
  2. 10.2307/249690 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.2307/249688 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1080/10705519509540000 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb00879.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.2307/249524 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1177/002224378101800104 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00065-3 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/07421222.2004.11045792 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00071-9 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.2307/249751 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00060-4 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Rogers E. M., 1995, The diffusion of innovation, fourth
  17. 10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00049-X · DOI
  18. 10.1287/isre.8.3.240 · DOI
  19. 10.2307/249590 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Thornton M. Jefferies A. Jones I. Alltree J.andLeinonenE.(2004).Changing pedagogy: does the introduction of networked learning have an impact on teaching? Networed Learning Conference 2004 Symposium 8 April 5–7 Lancaster University UK.
  21. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x · DOI
  22. 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Chang, S., & Tung, F.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-25
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
71-83
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W2027549543
Cited by
391
References
8
FWCI
26.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An empirical investigation of students' behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00742.x
The paper
Chang, S., & Tung, F. (2008). An empirical investigation of students' behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00742.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.