Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A taxonomy of virtual worlds usage in education

Duncan, Ishbel, Miller, Alan, Jiang, Shangyi·2012·British Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

Virtual worlds are an important tool in modern education practices as well as providing socialisation, entertainment and a laboratory for collaborative work. This paper focuses on the uses of virtual worlds for education and synthesises over 100 published academic papers, reports and educational websites from around the world. A taxonomy is then derived from these papers, delineating current theoretical and practical work on virtual world usage, specifically in the field of education. The taxonomy identifies rich veins of current research and practice in associated educational theory and in simulated worlds or environments, yet it also demonstrates the paucity of work in important areas such as evaluation, grading and accessibility. Practitioner notes: What is already known about this topic The use of virtual worlds for supporting education is widespread and increasing. There are numerous studies on virtual worlds usage in education. Virtual worlds are mainly used for collaborative‐ or simulation‐based education. What this paper adds An analysis and synthesis of over 100 academic papers and virtual worlds, multi‐user virtual environments and virtual learning environments. A taxonomic differentiation based upon population, educational activity and learning theory. A balance sheet of the disadvantages and advantages of using virtual worlds in education. Identification of under developed areas of research into virtual worlds in education. Implications for practice and/or policy Motivates the use of virtual worlds to support experiential learning, where real world experiential learning is difficult to achieve due to barriers of time, cost and place. Identification of difficulties and challenges in the educational use of virtual worlds. These may be overcome through future work or help identify where the use of virtual worlds is not appropriate. Identification of where the current development or research focus is: pedagogy, collaboration, enquiry‐based learning and identity, etc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01263.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Duncan, I., Miller, A., & Jiang, S.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-12
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
949-964
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W2170757288
Cited by
266
References
22
FWCI
42.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A taxonomy of virtual worlds usage in education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01263.x
The paper
Duncan, I., Miller, A., & Jiang, S. (2012). A taxonomy of virtual worlds usage in education. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01263.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.