Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 364

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011

Gao, Fei, Luo, Tian, Zhang, Ke·2012·British Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

This study critically analyzed the current body of published research on microblogging in education ( MIE ) to build a deep and comprehensive understanding of this increasingly popular phenomenon. Twenty‐one studies on MIE in 2008–2011 were selected based on the selection criteria and analyzed to answer the following questions: What types of research have been published on MIE ? How was microblogging used for teaching and learning in these studies? What educational benefits did microblogging have on teaching and learning? What suggestions and implications did the current research have for future MIE research and practices? The analysis suggests that microblogging has a potential to encourage participation, engagement, reflective thinking as well as collaborative learning under different learning settings. The quality of research, however, varies greatly, suggesting a need for rigorous research on MIE . The analysis has implications for MIE practices as well as research and development efforts. Practitioner Notes: What is already known about this topic: Microblogging has a potential to facilitate learning. Research on microblogging has been conducted under different educational settings. What this paper adds: What are the characteristics of the current research on microblogging in education. How educators and researchers integrated microblogging to achieve different educational goals as identified in these studies. What are the identified educational effects of using microblogging for teaching and learning. What are the challenges and suggestions of using microblogging in teaching and learning. Implications for practice and/or policy: Future research on microblogging in education should go beyond formal higher education settings by considering learning occurring in other settings. Future research needs to observe and analyze how learners participate and learn in microblogging‐based environments over time. Innovative data collection and analysis methods are needed to understand the interaction and learning that occur in such environments. Future research is needed to identify effective approaches of microblogging integration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 364

Metadata

Authors
Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-24
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
783-801
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W1571225249
Cited by
364
References
29
FWCI
69.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x
The paper
Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.