The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011
Abstract
This study critically analyzed the current body of published research on microblogging in education ( MIE ) to build a deep and comprehensive understanding of this increasingly popular phenomenon. Twenty‐one studies on MIE in 2008–2011 were selected based on the selection criteria and analyzed to answer the following questions: What types of research have been published on MIE ? How was microblogging used for teaching and learning in these studies? What educational benefits did microblogging have on teaching and learning? What suggestions and implications did the current research have for future MIE research and practices? The analysis suggests that microblogging has a potential to encourage participation, engagement, reflective thinking as well as collaborative learning under different learning settings. The quality of research, however, varies greatly, suggesting a need for rigorous research on MIE . The analysis has implications for MIE practices as well as research and development efforts. Practitioner Notes: What is already known about this topic: Microblogging has a potential to facilitate learning. Research on microblogging has been conducted under different educational settings. What this paper adds: What are the characteristics of the current research on microblogging in education. How educators and researchers integrated microblogging to achieve different educational goals as identified in these studies. What are the identified educational effects of using microblogging for teaching and learning. What are the challenges and suggestions of using microblogging in teaching and learning. Implications for practice and/or policy: Future research on microblogging in education should go beyond formal higher education settings by considering learning occurring in other settings. Future research needs to observe and analyze how learners participate and learn in microblogging‐based environments over time. Innovative data collection and analysis methods are needed to understand the interaction and learning that occur in such environments. Future research is needed to identify effective approaches of microblogging integration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age
Siemens, G. (2004) · Cited by 5,240
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410609519 · Cited by 2,732
Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities
Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007) · Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis · doi:10.1145/1348549.1348556 · Cited by 2,645
(1997) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 2,510
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
(2008) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203880869 · Cited by 1,678
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(02)00057-2 · Cited by 1,607
The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades: Twitter and student engagement
Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x · Cited by 1,535
Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x09336671 · Cited by 1,161
Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World
Hansen, D. L., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. (2010) · Cited by 987
Cited by
AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions
Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025 · Cited by 923
Self-citationWhatsApp Goes to School: Mobile Instant Messaging between Teachers and Students
Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014) · Journal of Information Technology Education: Research · doi:10.28945/2051 · Cited by 659
Snapping, pinning, liking or texting: Investigating social media in higher education beyond Facebook
Manca, S. (2020) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100707 · Cited by 347
How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review
Lai, J. W. M., & Bower, M. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010 · Cited by 334
University students' self-regulated learning using digital technologies
Yot-Domínguez, C., & Marcelo, C. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0076-8 · Cited by 213
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08-24
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 783-801
- ISSN
- 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8535
- OpenAlex
- W1571225249
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 69.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x
- The paper
- Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.