Cited by 193Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBullying, Victimization, and AggressionPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

They like me, they like me not': popularity and adolescents' perceptions of acceptance predicting social functioning over time

Open access
McElhaney, Kathleen B, Antonishak, Jill, Allen, Joseph P·2008·Child Development

Abstract

This study examined the dual roles of adolescents' perceptions of social acceptance and sociometric popularity in predicting relative changes over time in adolescents' social functioning. Observational, self-report, and peer report data were obtained from 164 adolescents who were interviewed at age 13 years and then again at age 14 years, as well as their same-sex close friends. Adolescents who felt positively about their own social standing fared well over time, regardless of their level of sociometric popularity. Further, low popularity was particularly problematic for adolescents who failed to see themselves as fitting in. Results suggest that during adolescence, when it becomes increasingly possible for teens to choose their own social niches, it is possible to be socially successful without being broadly popular.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01153.x

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-acceptance is critical in the teen years and may serve as a buffer in individuals who self-identity as socially disadvantaged in one or more domains.

    “Moreover, self-acceptance is critical in the teen years and may serve as a buffer in individuals who self-identity as socially disadvantaged in one or more domains (e.g., status or popularity) (McElhaney et al., 2008).”

    From A hope intervention for adolescents: a randomized controlled trial delivered by paraprofessionals (2025) · cites this paper as McElhaney et al., 2008

    The Discussion says that confidence in one’s social standing acted as a protective factor: teens with high self-perceived social acceptance fared well whether peers rated them popular or unpopular. The paper studies perceived acceptance by peers, not general self-acceptance, and does not establish a buffering effect across multiple domains of self-identified disadvantage. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Allen JP, Hall FD, Insabella GM, Land DJ, Marsh PA, Porter MR. Supportive Behavior Task manual. Charlottesville: Department of Psychology, University of Virginia; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen JP, Hall FH, Insabella G, Land D, Marsh PA, Porter MR. Unpublished manuscript. University of Virginia; 2001. The supportive behavior task coding system. [Google Scholar]
  3. Antonishak J, Schlatter AKW, Allen JP. Instability in adolescent peer groups. Poster presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research on Child Development; Atlanta, GA. 2005. Apr, [Google Scholar]
  4. Crowell J, Pan H, Goa Y, Treboux D, O’Connor E, Waters E. Unpublished manuscript. State University of New York; Stonybrook: 1998. The Secure Base Scoring System for Adults, Version 2.0. [Google Scholar]
  5. Harter S. Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver; 1988. [Google Scholar]
  6. Haynes C, Fainsilber Katz KL. Unpublished manuscript. University of Washington; 1998. Adolescent social skills technique coding manual. [Google Scholar]
  7. Julien D, Markman H, Lindahl K, Johnson H, Van Widenfelt B, Herskovits J. Unpublished manuscript. University of Denver; 1997. The interactional dimensions coding system. [Google Scholar]
  8. Manning N, Allen JP, McElhaney KB. Maternal conforming values and adolescent psychosocial adjustment. Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research on Adolescence; San Francisco, CA. 2006. Mar, [Google Scholar]
  9. Porter MR. Interpersonal expectations and quality of interactions: Associations between parents and peers. Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research on Child Development; Minneapolis, MN. 2001. Apr, [Google Scholar]
  10. Porter MR, Kaufmann S. Maternal support behaviors and the development of peer competence during adolescence. Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research on Child Development; Tampa, FL. 2003. Apr, [Google Scholar]
  11. Prinstein MJ. Assessment of adolescents’ preference and reputation based popularity using sociometric experts. Social Development (in press) [Google Scholar]
  12. Von Bank H, Brown BB, Steinberg L. Does awareness of peer crowd affiliation affect self-concept and well-being?. Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research on Adolescence; San Francisco, CA. 2006. Mar, [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McElhaney, K. B., Antonishak, J., & Allen, J. P.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
McElhaney, Kathleen B
Venue
Child Development
Published
2008-05-01
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
720-731
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2141375376
Cited by
193
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01hd058305-17a1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31- MH65711-01, F31MH065711, R01MH044934, R01-MH44934, R01-MH58066, R01MH058066)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD058305)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
sociometric popularity, social acceptance, adolescents, social functioning, peer relationships, social status, social niche, longitudinal change
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Psychology, Adolescent, Aggression, Attitude, Female, Hostility, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Social Conformity, Social Desirability, Psychological Distance, Social Isolation, Social Perception, Social Support, Sociometric Techniques, Time Factors, Southeastern United States, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review