Cited by 520Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Fine motor skills and executive function both contribute to kindergarten achievement.

Open access
Cameron, Claire E, Brock, Laura L, Murrah, William M, Bell, Lindsay H, Worzalla, Samantha L, Grissmer, David, Morrison, Frederick J·2012·Child Development

Abstract

This study examined the contribution of executive function (EF) and multiple aspects of fine motor skills to achievement on 6 standardized assessments in a sample of middle-socioeconomic status kindergarteners. Three- and 4-year-olds’ (n = 213) fine and gross motor skills were assessed in a home visit before kindergarten, EF was measured at fall of kindergarten, and Woodcock–Johnson III Tests of Academic Achievement were administered at fall and spring. Correlations indicated that EF and fine motor skills appeared distinct. Further, controlling for background variables, higher levels of both EF and fine motor skills, specifically design copy, predicted higher achievement on multiple subtests at kindergarten entry, as well as improvement from fall to spring. Implications for research on school readiness are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01768.x

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Design copy is highly related to other tests of executive function.

    “Design copy is highly related to other tests of executive function (Grissmer et al., 2010; Cameron et al., 2012; Fuhs et al., 2014; Lipsey et al., 2017) and has good test-retest reliability (r = 0.72 in Lipsey et al., 2017).”

    From Montessori Preschool Elevates and Equalizes Child Outcomes: A Longitudinal Study (2017) · cites this paper as Cameron et al., 2012

    The Results (page not available) state that the study’s executive-function measure, HTKS-EF, was positively correlated with some fine-motor measures, but not with design copy. That directly conflicts with the claim that design copy is highly related to other executive-function tests. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Head Toes Knees Shoulders Task has been used to measure both behavioural self-regulation and executive functioning.

    “Similarly, the “Head Toes Knees Shoulders Task” has been used to measure both behavioural self-regulation73 and executive functioning74.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brooks R Goldstein S 2007 Raising a self-disciplined child: Help your child become more responsible, confident, and resilient New York, NY McGraw-Hill
  2. Medwell J Strand S Wray D 2007 The role of handwriting in composing for Y2 children Journal of Reading, Writing and Literacy 2 11 21
  3. Meisels SJ Marsden DB Wiske MS Henderson LW 1997 Early Screening Inventory-Revised New York Pearson Early Learning

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cameron, C. E., Brock, L. L., Murrah, W. M., Bell, L. H., Worzalla, S. L., Grissmer, D., & Morrison, F. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • College of Charleston (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Cameron, Claire E
Venue
Child Development
Published
2012-07-01
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
1229-1244
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W1521378727
Cited by
520
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
83.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD27176, U10HD038121, R01HD027176)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
fine motor skills, executive function, school readiness, gross motor skills, preschool children, academic performance, socioeconomic status
MeSH terms
Achievement, Awareness, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Educational Status, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Motor Skills, Reading, Vocabulary, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review