Cited by 1,822Aging and Gerontology ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologyRetirement, Disability, and Employment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stereotype Embodiment: A Psychosocial Approach to Aging

Open access
Levy, Becca·2009·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Researchers have increasingly turned their attention from younger individuals who hold age stereotypes to older individuals who are targeted by these stereotypes. The refocused research has shown that positive and negative age stereotypes held by older individuals can have beneficial and detrimental effects, respectively, on a variety of cognitive and physical outcomes. Drawing on these experimental and longitudinal studies, a theory of stereotype embodiment is presented here. It proposes that stereotypes are embodied when their assimilation from the surrounding culture leads to self-definitions that, in turn, influence functioning and health. The theory has four components: The stereotypes (a) become internalized across the life span, (b) can operate unconsciously, (c) gain salience from self-relevance, and (d) utilize multiple pathways. The central message of the theory, and the research supporting it, is that the aging process is, in part, a social construct.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01662.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Levy B.R., 2000, Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 33, 81
  2. Spiro H., 2008, Connecticut Medicine, 72, 563

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,001

Metadata

Authors
Levy, B.
Affiliations
University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Levy, Becca
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2009-12
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
332-336
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2151262602
Cited by
1,822
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 218 · 2025: 206 · 2024: 189 · 2023: 166 · 2022: 169 · 2021: 141 · 2020: 191 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 25
FWCI
17.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K01AG001051, R01AG032284)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL089314)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
age stereotypes, older adults, self-definition, internalization of stereotypes, self-relevance, social construction of aging, health outcomes, cognitive function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review