The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Threat, Authoritarianism, and Selective Exposure to Information
Abstract
We examined the hypothesis that threat alters the cognitive strategies used by high authoritarians in seeking out new political information from the environment. In a laboratory experiment, threat was manipulated through a “mortality salience” manipulation used in research on terror management theory ( Pyszczynski, Solomon & Greenberg, 2003 ). Subjects (N = 92) were then invited to read one of three editorial articles on the topic of capital punishment. We found that in the absence of threat, both low and high authoritarians were responsive to salient norms of evenhandedness in information selection, preferring exposure to a two‐sided article that presents the merits of both sides of an issue to an article that selectively touts the benefits of the pro or con side of the issue. However, in the presence of threat, high but not low authoritarians became significantly more interested in exposure to an article containing uniformly pro‐attitudinal arguments, and significantly less interested in a balanced, two‐sided article. Finally, a path analysis indicated that selective exposure to attitude‐congruent information led to more internally consistent policy attitudes and inhibited attitude change. Discussion focuses on the role of threat in conditioning the cognitive and attitudinal effects of authoritarianism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Individuals with a lower threshold for tolerating uncertainty tend to be more rigid and closed-minded in their worldviews, values, and attitudes [45,153], especially when uncertainty is explicitly linked with threat [154,155].”
From Impact of Media-Induced Uncertainty on Mental Health: Narrative-Based Perspective. (2025) · cites this paper as [154]
In the citing paper
“Results suggest that, consistent with some lines of speculation [56], individual-level authoritarianism shapes political systems, rather than political systems shaping individual attitudes (although, of course, neither causal path necessarily operates at the exclusion of the other).”
From Pathogens and Politics: Further Evidence That Parasite Prevalence Predicts Authoritarianism (2013) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. J. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,558
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408
Book Review: The Psychology of Attitudes
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,173
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Bruνswik, E., Levinson, D. M., & Sandford, R. N. (2001) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446220986.n8 · Cited by 6,460
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
Kenski, H. C., & Zaller, J. R. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074664 · Cited by 5,150
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 3×
“With regard to threat sensitivity, Lavine, Lodge, Polichak, and Taber (2002) found that individuals scoring high on Altemeyer's right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) scale responded more quickly to threatening words (e.”
BackgroundInfluentialMadison, P., & Mischel, W. (1968) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421067 · Cited by 4,395
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Altemeyer B., 1988, Enemies of freedom
- 10.1037//0022-3514.71.4.637 · DOI
- 10.1037//0033-295X.85.6.485 · DOI
- Bentler P. B., 1985, Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program
- 10.1037//0022-3514.52.2.279 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-3514.61.4.629 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.75 · DOI
- Eagly A. H., 1981, Cognitive responses in persuasion, 173
- Eagly A. H., 1993, The psychology of attitudes
- Fazio R. H., 1986, The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior
- 10.1037//0022-3514.58.2.308 · DOI · Paper page
- Iyengar S., 1987, News that matters
- Lavine H., 1999, Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes, 97
- 10.1037//0033-295X.106.4.835 · DOI · Paper page
- Thompson M. M., 1995, Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences, 361
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108595841 · Cited by 2,986
Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 · Cited by 2,125
The end of the end of ideology.
Jost, J. T. (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.7.651 · Cited by 1,614
Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information
Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0015701 · Cited by 1,292
Two Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Research
Burke, B. L., Martens, A., & Faucher, E. H. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309352321 · Cited by 1,188
Metadata
- Authors
- Lavine, H., Lodge, M., & Freitas, K.
- Affiliations
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Venue
- Political Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-244
- ISSN
- 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9221
- OpenAlex
- W2041413575
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Political Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- authoritarianism, threats, selective exposure, information seeking, mortality salience, terror management theory, death penalty, attitude consistency, attitude change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review