Cited by 94Multisensory perception and integrationPhonetics and Phonology ResearchSpeech and Audio Processing

Perception of Synthesized Audible and Visible Speech

Massaro, Dominic W., Cohen, Michael M.·1990·Psychological Science

Abstract

The research reported in this paper uses novel stimuli to study how speech perception is influenced by information presented to ear and eye. Auditory and visual sources of information (syllables) were synthesized and presented in isolation or in factorial combination. A five-step continuum between the syllables ibal and idal was synthesized along both auditory and visual dimensions, by varying properties of the syllable at its onset. The onsets of the second and third formants were manipulated in the audible speech. For the visible speech, the shape of the lips and the jaw position at the onset of the syllable were manipulated. Subjects’ identification judgments of the test syllables presented on videotape were influenced by both auditory and visual information. The results were used to test between a fuzzy logical model of speech perception (FLMP) and a categorical model of perception (CMP). These tests indicate that evaluation and integration of the two sources of information makes available continuous as opposed to just categorical information. In addition, the integration of the two sources appears to be nonadditive in that the least ambiguous source has the largest impact on the judgment. The two sources of information appear to be evaluated, integrated, and identified as described by the FLMP-an optimal algorithm for combining information from multiple sources. The research provides a theoretical framework for understanding the improvement in speech perception by hearing-impaired listeners when auditory speech is supplemented with other sources of information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00068.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The McGurk effect occurs with both elaborate and schematic synthetic visual stimuli.

    “The effect occurs with the use of both elaborate and schematic synthetic visual stimuli”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Massaro & Cohen, 1990

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
1990-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
55-63
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2012077291
Cited by
94
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
speech perception, synthetic speech, lip reading, audiovisual integration, categorical perception, syllable onset, hearing-impaired listeners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review