Genetic and Environmental Influences on Religious Interests, Attitudes, and Values: A Study of Twins Reared Apart and Together
Abstract
The role of genetic and environmental factors in the expression of religious interests, attitudes, and values was examined using data from adult twins reared apart and adult twins reared together. The Religious Values scale of the Allport-Vernon-Lindzey Study of Values, a Religious Interest scale from the Strong Campbell Interest Inventory, the Wiggins Religious Fundamentalism scale from the MMPI, a Leisure Time Religious Interest scale, and a second measure of Occupational Religious Interest were administered to 53 identical and 31 fraternal twin pairs who had been reared apart. The Leisure Time Religious Interest Scale and the second measure of Occupational Religious Interest were also administered to 458 identical and 363 fraternal twin pairs who had been reared together. Biometric model fitting indicated that approximately 50% of the observed variance of all five measures is genetically influenced.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biological and ethological universals affect significantly the construction and execution of certain cultural practices.
“What is more, these biological and ultimately ethological universals affect significantly the construction and execution of certain cultural practices, a phenomenon some refer to as”
From Disgusting Bodies, Disgusting Religion: The Biology of Tantra (2011) · cites this paper as Waller et al. 1990
Highly heritable individual-level traits (such as religiosity) may be more strongly influenced by genetic mechanisms, whereas societal outcomes such as democratization and the strength of family ties may be more strongly influenced by cultural transmission.
“Highly heritable individual-level traits (such as religiosity; Waller et al. 1990) may be more strongly influenced by genetic mechanisms, whereas societal outcomes such as democratization and the strength of family ties may be more strongly influenced by cultural transmission.”
From Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity (2012) · cites this paper as Waller et al. 1990
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sources of human psychological differences: the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart
Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D. T., McGue, M., Segal, N. L., & Tellegen, A. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2218526 · Cited by 1,373 · see citing works
Self-citationSmith, T. B., McCullough, M. E., & Poll, J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.614 · Cited by 1,150 · see citing works
Genes, evolution, and personality
Bouchard, T. J., & Loehlin, J. C. (2001) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1023/a:1012294324713 · Cited by 1,085 · see citing works
Self-citationHaidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008) · The Innate Mind, Volume 3 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019 · Cited by 650 · see citing works
Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000021 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Religion, psychopathology, and substance use and abuse; a multimeasure, genetic-epidemiologic study
(1997) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.154.3.322 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a review and conceptual model
Bogaert, S., Boone, C., & Declerck, C. (2008) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466607x244970 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Absorption, openness to experience, and hypnotizability
Glisky, M. L., Tataryn, D. J., Tobias, B. A., Kihlstrom, J. F., & McConkey, K. M. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.263 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Religion and education as mediators of attitudes: A multivariate analysis
Truett, K. R., Eaves, L. J., Meyer, J. M., Heath, A. C., & Martin, N. G. (1992) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01066792 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Fragile self-esteem and affective instability in posttraumatic stress disorder
Kashdan, T. B., Uswatte, G., Steger, M. F., & Julian, T. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.003 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Kendler, K. S., & Myers, J. (2009) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09020182 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Schmidt, F. L. (2017) · Archives of Scientific Psychology · doi:10.1037/arc0000033 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Disgusting Bodies, Disgusting Religion: The Biology of Tantra
Ellis, T. B. (2011) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfr077 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Waller, N. G., Kojetin, B. A., Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D. T., & Tellegen, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 138-142
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2095736483
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Keywords
- religious interest, religious attitudes, religious values, religious fundamentalism, heritability, genetic factors, environmental influences, twins reared apart, monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review