Cited by 269Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyReligion and Society Interactions

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Religious Interests, Attitudes, and Values: A Study of Twins Reared Apart and Together

Waller, Niels G., Kojetin, Brian A., Bouchard, Thomas J., Lykken, David T., Tellegen, Auke·1990·Psychological Science

Abstract

The role of genetic and environmental factors in the expression of religious interests, attitudes, and values was examined using data from adult twins reared apart and adult twins reared together. The Religious Values scale of the Allport-Vernon-Lindzey Study of Values, a Religious Interest scale from the Strong Campbell Interest Inventory, the Wiggins Religious Fundamentalism scale from the MMPI, a Leisure Time Religious Interest scale, and a second measure of Occupational Religious Interest were administered to 53 identical and 31 fraternal twin pairs who had been reared apart. The Leisure Time Religious Interest Scale and the second measure of Occupational Religious Interest were also administered to 458 identical and 363 fraternal twin pairs who had been reared together. Biometric model fitting indicated that approximately 50% of the observed variance of all five measures is genetically influenced.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00083.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biological and ethological universals affect significantly the construction and execution of certain cultural practices.

    “What is more, these biological and ultimately ethological universals affect significantly the construction and execution of certain cultural practices, a phenomenon some refer to as”

    From Disgusting Bodies, Disgusting Religion: The Biology of Tantra (2011) · cites this paper as Waller et al. 1990

  • Highly heritable individual-level traits (such as religiosity) may be more strongly influenced by genetic mechanisms, whereas societal outcomes such as democratization and the strength of family ties may be more strongly influenced by cultural transmission.

    “Highly heritable individual-level traits (such as religiosity; Waller et al. 1990) may be more strongly influenced by genetic mechanisms, whereas societal outcomes such as democratization and the strength of family ties may be more strongly influenced by cultural transmission.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waller, N. G., Kojetin, B. A., Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D. T., & Tellegen, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
1990-03
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
138-142
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2095736483
Cited by
269
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religious interest, religious attitudes, religious values, religious fundamentalism, heritability, genetic factors, environmental influences, twins reared apart, monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review