Cited by 88Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Fragile self-esteem and affective instability in posttraumatic stress disorder

Kashdan, Todd B., Uswatte, Gitendra, Steger, Michael F., Julian, Terri·2006·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Temporal fluctuations in self-esteem and affect are prominent features of several clinical conditions (e.g., depression), but there is an absence of empirical work examining their role in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Individuals who experience large fluctuations in self-evaluations and affect are considered more vulnerable to psychopathology than individuals able to adequately modulate their self-image and emotional responses. We examined the relevance of self-esteem and affective instability to PTSD. Veterans with and without PTSD completed 14 daily ratings of self-esteem, positive affect, negative affect, and gratitude. Compared to veterans without PTSD, veterans with PTSD exhibited more temporal fluctuations in self-esteem, negative affect, and gratitude, with a smaller effect for positive affect. For all veterans, self-esteem and negative affective instability was associated with diminished well-being. Except for self-esteem instability, most findings were substantially reduced after accounting for variance attributable to PTSD diagnoses and mean intensity levels over the 14-day monitoring period. These data suggest self-esteem instability is important in understanding the lives of veterans with and without PTSD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.003

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kashdan, T. B., Uswatte, G., Steger, M. F., & Julian, T.
Affiliations
  • George Mason University (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
Kashdan, Todd B.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
44
Issue
11
Pages
1609-1619
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975668684
Cited by
88
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, self-esteem, neuroticism, temporal fluctuations, veterans, negative affect, positive affect, gratitude, well-being
MeSH terms
Affect, Humans, Personal Satisfaction, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review