Cited by 88Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Panic Search: Fear Produces Efficient Visual Search for Nonthreatening Objects

Becker, Mark W.·2009·Psychological Science

Abstract

The ability to rapidly detect and respond to potentially threatening has survival value that has led researchers to posit that a threat detection system should have evolved within human cognitive architecture. LeDoux and his colleagues (Armony, Servan-Schreiber, Cohen, & LeDoux, 1997; LeDoux, 2000; Phelps & LeDoux, 2005) have proposed an early-warning system that is mediated by the amygdala. Under this view, the amygdala's rapid, preattentive evaluation of the emotional relevance of a threatening stimulus produces a rapid shift of attention toward the threat. Behavioral studies demonstrating efficient visual search for threatening targets (Eastwood, Smilek, & Merikle, 2001; Ohman, Flykt, & Esteves, 2001) and the capture of attention by threatening (Koster, Crombez, Van Damme, Verschuere, & De Houwer, 2004; Smith, Most, Newsome, & Zald, 2006) support the claim that attention rapidly shifts toward threatening stimuli. Importantly, the effect of this mechanism is selective: It increases processing for only the threat-relevant object. Ideally, the detection of threat would also produce a more generalized increase in processing efficiency, thereby allowing one to rapidly identify objects that would be beneficial to fleeing or fighting the threat, objects that themselves may not be threatening. Very little research has investigated how threatening influence the processing of non-threat-relevant stimuli. Recently, Phelps, Ling, and Carrasco (2006) ran such a study and found that contrast sensitivity increased when a fearful face preceded a contrast-discrimination task. They concluded that people actually see better in the presence of emotional stimuli (p. 298). How increased visual processing of contrast would be advantageous in an emotional situation was not directly addressed by their study. Here we posit that increased low-level visual

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02303.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Becker (2009) found more rapid disengagement from neutral stimuli following the presentation of a threatening stimulus in an unselected sample.

    “Becker (2009), for example, found more rapid disengagement from neutral stimuli following the presentation of a threatening stimulus in an unselected sample.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Becker, M. W.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Becker, Mark W.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2009-04
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
435-437
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2129792469
Cited by
88
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
threat detection, amygdala, attentional capture, emotional face processing, contrast sensitivity, contrast discrimination, visual search
MeSH terms
Environment, Fear, Humans, Reaction Time, Visual Perception, Panic Disorder, Signal Detection, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review