Cited by 155Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

An emotion-induced attentional blink elicited by aversively conditioned stimuli.

Smith, Stephen D., Most, Steven B., Newsome, Leslie A., Zald, David H.·2006·Emotion

Abstract

The current study examines whether aversively conditioned stimuli can modulate attention to such a degree that they impair the perception of subsequently presented nonemotional targets. In the initial phase of this study, participants viewed 3 categories of photographs, 1 of which was paired with an aversive noise. Following conditioning, participants searched for a target embedded within a series of 17 rapidly presented images on each trial. Critically, a conditioned or unconditioned item from the initial phase appeared 200 ms or 800 ms before the target. At 200-ms lags but not 800-ms lags, the conditioned images impaired target detection relative to the other distractors. Thus, temporary visual deficits can be induced by otherwise neutral distractors whose aversive associations have only recently been learned.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.523

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combat-exposed veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder showed a strong attentional blink for combat images relative to healthy controls.

    “One of the most powerful examples of these lingering biases of attention is seen in AB tasks in which combat-exposed veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder showed a strong AB for combat images relative to healthy controls (Olatunji, Armstrong, McHugo, & Zald, 2013; cf. Smith, Most, Newsome, & Zald, 2006; for a review, see McHugo, Olatunji, & Zald, 2013).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Smith, Most, Newsome, & Zald, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, S. D., Most, S. B., Newsome, L. A., & Zald, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2006-08
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
523-527
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2167022301
Cited by
154
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
attentional blink, aversive conditioning, emotional conditioning, visual attention, target detection, distractor interference, emotional memory, rapid serial visual presentation
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Arousal, Association Learning, Attention, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Classical, Discrimination Learning, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Proactive Inhibition, Reaction Time, Set, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review