Technological interweavement: a means of achieving innovation success
Abstract
In this paper, results are presented of an empirical study of the Lake Constance region covering a sample of 848 manufacturing companies. Based upon multivariate analyses, the paper documents that the mobilization of external resources and know‐how is a critical factor for a firm's technological innovation success which in turn is the main determinant of commercial innovation success. The findings show that there are three kinds of technology‐oriented external relationships, which prove to be of special importance: close contacts with customers, linkages to universities and research institutes and R&D‐cooperations with other companies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gemünden, Heydebreck and Herden's (1992) survey of 4564 firms in the Lake Constance region examined interactions between firms, customers, suppliers and university interactions.
“This point is supported by Gemünden, Heydebreck and Herden's (1992) survey of 4564 firms in the Lake Constance region (on the border between Austria, Germany and Switzerland).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Gemünden, Heydebreck and Herden's (1992)
Customer involvement reduces the risks of innovation.
“Customer involvement reduces the risks of innovation (Gemünden et al. 1992;Ragatz et al. 1997).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Gemünden et al. 1992
Nearly 50% of companies identified customer engagement as a precondition for innovation success.
“In Gemünden et al's (1992) study, for example, 75% of companies engaged customers in the innovation process and nearly 50% identified it as a precondition for innovation success.”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Gemünden et al's (1992)
In Gemünden et al's (1992) study, 75% of companies engaged customers in the innovation process.
“In Gemünden et al's (1992) study, for example, 75% of companies engaged customers in the innovation process and nearly 50% identified it as a precondition for innovation success.”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Gemünden et al's (1992)
The innovator learns from the customer the likely market potential of the product idea.
“The innovator learns from the customer the likely market potential of the product idea (Gemünden et al. 1992).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Gemünden et al. 1992
Customer involvement tends to be useful at the beginning in terms of idea generation but is less so during the developmental process where the manufacturer tends to lead.
“Despite this evidence of the value of business customers in the innovation process, more detailed empirical study has shown that customer involvement tends to be useful at the beginning in terms of idea generation but is less so during the developmental process where the manufacturer tends to lead (Biemans, 1989;Bruce and Rodgus, 1991;Gemünden et al's 1992, Conway, 1995).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Gemünden et al's 1992
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972 · see citing works
Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products
Urban, G. L., & von Hippel, E. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.5.569 · Cited by 1,125 · see citing works
SAPPHO updated - project SAPPHO phase II
Rothwell, R., Freeman, C., Horlsey, A., Jervis, V. T. P., Robertson, A. B., & Townsend, J. (1974) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(74)90010-9 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747 · see citing works
Network configuration and innovation success: An empirical analysis in German high-tech industries
Gemünden, H. G., Ritter, T., & Heydebreck, P. (1996) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(96)00026-2 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Gemünden, H. G., Heydebreck, P., & Herden, R.
- ORCID
- Gemünden, H. G.
- Venue
- R&D Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 359-376
- ISSN
- 0033-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9310
- OpenAlex
- W2028817353
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- R and D Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Keywords
- knowledge mobilization, customer relationships, university-industry collaboration, R&D cooperation, manufacturing companies, Lake Constance region
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review