The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why co‐creation experience matters? Creative experience and its impact on the quantity and quality of creative contributions
Abstract
This article introduces ‘virtual design competitions’ as a new means of opening up the innovation process and enriching the companies, ‘design‐ideas’ by utilizing the creativity of a multiplicity of external designers and enthused consumers all over the world. The ‘Swarovski Enlightened™jewellery design competition’, explored in this study, demonstrates the enormous potential of virtual co‐creation platforms. It further highlights the importance of the co‐creation experience and its impact on the quantity and quality of designs submitted. First, we introduce the idea of virtual co‐creation platforms and the requirements on the design of such a platform. Second, we explore the impact of the co‐creation experience on the content contributed by participants. Our study shows that co‐creation experience significantly impacts the number of contributions by consumers as well as the quality of submitted designs. Our paper contributes to a better theoretic understanding of the impact of a participant's perceived autonomous, enjoyable, and competent experience, as well as participants' perceived sense of community on their experience. From a managerial perspective, it provides guidance in designing successful idea and design competitions. While innovation managers may be interested in creative contributions, for participants, it is the experience which matters. Fully featured community platforms rather than single idea submission websites are required to attract creative users to submit their ideas and designs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
Qu, X. (2007) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2007.s455 · Cited by 14,705
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Mueller, C. W., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074955 · Cited by 14,120
Cited by
Co-creation of tourist experiences: a literature review
Campos, A. C., Mendes, J., Valle, P. O. D., & Scott, N. (2018) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2015.1081158 · Cited by 655
Co-creation in higher education: towards a conceptual model
Dollinger, M., Lodge, J., & Coates, H. (2018) · Journal of Marketing for Higher Education · doi:10.1080/08841241.2018.1466756 · Cited by 377
The periphery on stage: The intra-organizational dynamics in online communities of creation
Rullani, F., & Haefliger, S. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.008 · Cited by 79
Building Community Knowledge In Online Competitions: Motivation, Practices and Challenges
Cheng, R., & Zachry, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3415250 · Cited by 20
Finding Place in a Design Space: Challenges for Supporting Community Design Efforts at Scale
MacNeil, S., Ding, Z., Boone, A., Grubbs, A. B., & Dow, S. P. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449246 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Füller, J., Hutter, K., & Faullant, R.
- Venue
- R&D Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05-23
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-273
- ISSN
- 0033-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9310
- OpenAlex
- W1929091123
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 85
- FWCI
- 53.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why co‐creation experience matters? Creative experience and its impact on the quantity and quality of creative contributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00640.x
- The paper
- Füller, J., Hutter, K., & Faullant, R. (2011). Why co‐creation experience matters? Creative experience and its impact on the quantity and quality of creative contributions. R&D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00640.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.