The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Abstract
Research in the area of educational technology has often been critiqued for a lack of theoretical grounding. In this article we propose a conceptual framework for educational technology by building on Shulrnan's formulation of “pedagogical content knowledge” and extend it to the phenomenon of teachers integrating technology into their pedagogy. This framework is the result of 5 years of work on a program of research focused on teacher professional development and faculty development in higher education. It attempts to capture some of the essential qualities of teacher knowledge required for technology integration in teaching, while addressing the complex, multifaceted, and situated nature of this knowledge. We argue, briefly, that thoughtful pedagogical uses of technology require the development of a complex, situated form of knowledge that we call Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK). In doing so, we posit the complex roles of, and interplay among, three main components of learning environments: content, pedagogy, and technology. We argue that this model has much to offer to discussions of technology integration at multiple levels: theoretical, pedagogical, and methodological. In this article, we describe the theory behind our framework, provide examples of our teaching approach based upon the framework, and illustrate the methodological contributions that have resulted from this work.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“First, the absence of systematic training constitutes a persistent structural limitation (Mishra & Koehler, 2006).”
From Adoption and Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Teaching: Multi-Institutional Analysis of Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“The TPACK framework holds that mere exposure to AI tools is insufficient for effective teaching.”
From Adoption and Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Teaching: Multi-Institutional Analysis of Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“Instructors require situated, discipline-specific training that addresses the intersection of AI capabilities (technological knowledge), language pedagogy (pedagogical knowledge), and linguistic content (content knowledge).”
From Adoption and Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Teaching: Multi-Institutional Analysis of Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“Two conceptual frameworks were indicated in literature as frequently used for informing the design of teacher education digital capability programmes, and were well-supported by empirical research.”
From From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework (2020) · cites this paper as Mishra and Koehler's (2006)
In the citing paper
“Unlike SAMR, TPACK does not represent a hierarchy or staged progression, but rather presents a holistic model that theorises the relationship between, and contribution of, technological, pedagogical and content knowledge to effective curriculum learning-focused technology use.”
From From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework (2020) · cites this paper as Mishra and Koehler's (2006)
In the citing paper
“TPACK posits that effective technology integration is not about technology alone, but occurs at the dynamic intersection of three core domains of knowledge: Technological Knowledge (TK) (understanding the tools), Pedagogical Knowledge (PK) (understanding how people learn), and Content Knowledge (CK) (understanding the subject matter). TPACK's central tenet is that pedagogical goals and content”
From Paying the Cognitive Debt: An Experiential Learning Framework for Integrating AI in Social Work Education (2025) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“TPACK emphasizes the dynamic integration of technology, pedagogy, and content (Mishra and Koehler, 2006), which enables teachers to move beyond basic tool operation and align technology with instructional goals.”
From AI teaching innovation behavior among college teachers: a structural equation modeling analysis based on the AI-TPACK framework, teaching self-efficacy, professional identity, and AI literacy (2026) · cites this paper as Mishra and Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“Despite promising developments, significant research gaps persist in understanding the optimal integration mechanisms for AIGC tools in cross-disciplinary learning9.”
From Integrating AI-generated content tools in higher education: a comparative analysis of interdisciplinary learning outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“The independent variables selected for the model were chosen based on a priori theoretical considerations [49–51] and underwent rigorous evaluation for multicollinearity”
In the citing paper
“The TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) framework developed by Mishra & Koehler (2006) sets a crucial foundation for understanding how teachers integrate technologies, such as AI chatbots, into their practices”
From A cross-sectional look at teacher reactions, worries, and professional development needs related to generative AI in an urban school district (2025) · cites this paper as Mishra & Koehler, 2006
In the citing paper
“This finding is in line with previous research that demonstrates that introducing novel technology into classrooms is not just a financial or technical issue.”
From Understanding the determinants of novel technology adoption among teachers: the case of 3D printing (2020) · cites this paper as Mishra and Koehler 2006
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
DEWEY, J. M. (1986) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131728609335764 · Cited by 13,872
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
Educating the reflective practitioner
Schön, D. A. (1987) · Cited by 11,335
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 · Cited by 8,742
(2014) · Palgrave Macmillan eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137399595.0007 · Cited by 8,328
DEWEY, J. M. (2026) · State University of New York Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9798855805482-007 · Cited by 5,217
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Project 2061: Proceedings of the second AAAS technology education research conference. Washington DC: Author.
- Anderson R. D., and Mitchner C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In and and Gabel D.L. (Ed.), Handbook of science teaching and learning (pp. 32—37). New York: Macmillan.
- Barab S. A., and Duffy T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In Jonassen D., and Land S. (Eds.), Theoretical foundation of learning environments (pp. 25—56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- 10.1177/016146810110300601 · DOI · Paper page
- Grossman P. (1990). The making of a teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Harel I., and Papert S. (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Koehler M. J., and Mishra P. (2002). Art from randomness. How Inverso uses chance to create haiku [Electronic version]. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 4(1). Retrieved June 29, 2004, from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2002/1/03/index.asp
- Lankshear C. (1997). Changing literacies. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
- Medawar P. B. (1963). Is the scientific paper a fraud? In and and Medawar P.B. (Ed.), The Threat and the glory (pp. 228—233). New York: HarperCollins.
- Mishra P. (1998). Learning complex concepts in chemistry with multiple representations: Theory based design and evaluation of a hypertext for the periodic system of elements. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
- 10.1108/978-1-60752-582-020251002 · DOI
- Papert S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In Papert S., and Harel I. (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1—11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Selfe C. (1990). Technology in the English classroom: Computers through the lens of feminist pedagogy. In and and Handa C. (Ed.), Computers and community: Teaching composition in the twenty-first century (pp. 118—139). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
- Simon H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Veal W. R., and MaKinster J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies [Electronic version]. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4). Retrieved June 28, 2004 from http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/ejsev3n4.html.
- Vyas S., and Mishra P. (2002). The re-design of an after-school reading club. In Garner R., Gillingham M., and Zhao Y. (Eds.), Hanging out: After-school community based programs for children (pp. 75—93). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
- Wong D., Mishra P., Koehler M. J., and Siebenthal S. (in press). Teacher as filmmaker: iVideos, technology education, and professional development. In Girod M., and Steed J. (Eds.), Technology in the college classroom. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
- Zhao Y. (Ed.). (2003). What teachers should know about technology: Perspectives and practices. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
- Zhao Y., and Conway P. (2001). What's in and what's out? An analysis of state technology plans. Teachers College Record. Retrieved June 29, 2004, from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=10717
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,048
Investigating the impact of TPACK development course on pre-service science teachers’ performances
Aktaş, İ., & Özmen, H. (2020) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-020-09653-x · Cited by 72
Rahman, A. (2021) · Higher Education for the Future · doi:10.1177/2347631120980549 · Cited by 72
Huang, L., & Lajoie, S. P. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104169 · Cited by 90
Ghiasvand, F., & Seyri, H. (2025) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2025.105022 · Cited by 93
The role of information technology in e-learning systems success
Eom, S. B., Ashill, N., Arbaugh, J., & Stapleton, J. L. (2012) · Human Systems Management · doi:10.3233/hsm-2012-0767 · Cited by 80
Çelik, İ., Şahi̇n, İ., & Aktürk, A. O. (2014) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.51.1.a · Cited by 72
Interactive storytelling for children
Garzotto, F., Paolini, P., & Sabiescu, A. G. (2010) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/1810543.1810613 · Cited by 72
Han, I., Eom, M., & Shin, W. S. (2013) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.006 · Cited by 72
Gill, L., & Dalgarno, B. (2017) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2017.1287124 · Cited by 72
Teaching with Digital Technology: Obstacles and Opportunities
Thomas, M. O. J., & Palmer, J. M. (2013) · Mathematics education in the digital era · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4638-1_4 · Cited by 72
Kwon, K., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sari, A. R., Khlaif, Z. N., Zhu, M., Nadir, H., & Gok, F. (2019) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-019-00402-5 · Cited by 80
Walan, S. (2020) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09828-6 · Cited by 71
How Does Digital Competence Training Affect Teachers' Professional Development and Activities?
Reisoğlu, İ. (2021) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-021-09501-w · Cited by 96
Calderón-Garrido, D., & Carnicer, J. G. (2021) · Music Education Research · doi:10.1080/14613808.2021.1902488 · Cited by 71
Perspectives of Generative AI in Chemistry Education Within the TPACK Framework
Feldman-Maggor, Y., Blonder, R., & Alexandron, G. (2024) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-024-10147-3 · Cited by 115
Faculty Role Integration and Community Engagement: Harmony or Cacophony?
Bloomgarden, A., & O’Meara, K. A. (2007) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 71
Exploring Elements That Support Teachers Engagement in Online Professional Development
Prestridge, S., & Tondeur, J. (2015) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci5030199 · Cited by 71
Mouza, C. (2011) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782577 · Cited by 71
Simulation Use in Paramedic Education Research (SUPER): A Descriptive Study
McKenna, K. D., Carhart, E., Bercher, D., Spain, A., Todaro, J., & Freel, J. (2015) · Prehospital Emergency Care · doi:10.3109/10903127.2014.995845 · Cited by 71
Primary EFL Teachers’ Technology Use in China: Patterns and Perceptions
Li, G., & Ni, X. (2011) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688210390783 · Cited by 71
Learning from the early adopters: developing the Digital Practitioner
Bennett, L. (2014) · Research in Learning Technology · doi:10.3402/rlt.v22.21453 · Cited by 71
Lehrerbildung in der digitalen Welt
Herzig, B., & Martin, A. M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-18333-2_6 · Cited by 70
Describing increasing proficiency in teachers’ knowledge of the effective use of digital technology
Saubern, R., Urbach, D., Koehler, M. J., & Phillips, M. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103784 · Cited by 70
Self-citationTunjera, N., & Chigona, A. (2019) · International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education · doi:10.4018/ijicte.2020070110 · Cited by 70
Exploring Challenges of Online Education in COVID Times
Pandit, D., & Agrawal, S. (2021) · FIIB Business Review · doi:10.1177/2319714520986254 · Cited by 70
Štemberger, T., & Konrad, S. Č. (2021) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v16i14.22649 · Cited by 87
Digital Teaching Competence: A Systematic Review
Domínguez, F. I. R., Antequera, J. G., Pérez, A. G., Rodríguez, M. I. P., & González-Fernández, A. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14116428 · Cited by 159
Addressing Digital Divide through Digital Literacy Training Programs: A Systematic Literature Review
Choudhary, H., & Bansal, N. (2022) · Digital Education Review · doi:10.1344/der.2022.41.224-248 · Cited by 70
Digital literacy scale: Validity and reliability study with the rasch model
Avinç, E., & Doğan, F. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12662-7 · Cited by 115
Avoiding technology‐enhanced non‐learning
Kinchin, I. M. (2012) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01264.x · Cited by 70
Cavin, R. M. (2008) · Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference · Cited by 68
Higgins, T. E., & Spitulnik, M. W. (2008) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9118-2 · Cited by 70
Preschool teachers’ use of ICTs: Towards a typology of practice
Masoumi, D. (2015) · Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood · doi:10.1177/1463949114566753 · Cited by 70
Peer modeling and innovation adoption among teachers in online professional development
Ching, C. C., & Hursh, A. W. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.011 · Cited by 80
Benton-Borghi, B. H. (2013) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.48.2.g · Cited by 70
Ay, Y., Karadağ, E., & Acat, M. B. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.017 · Cited by 70
Tondeur, J., Petko, D., Christensen, R. W., Drossel, K., Starkey, L., Knezek, G., & Schmidt-Crawford, D. A. (2021) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09911-0 · Cited by 105
Teacher educators’ professional agency in facilitating professional digital competence
Nagel, I., Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., & Afdal, H. W. (2023) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2023.104238 · Cited by 106
Gen-AI integration in higher education: Predicting intentions using SEM-ANN approach
Jain, K., & Raghuram, J. N. V. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12506-4 · Cited by 89
Robot-Aided Learning and r-Learning Services
Han, J. (2010) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/8143 · Cited by 70
Sang, G., Tondeur, J., Chai, C. S., & Dong, Y. (2014) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/1359866x.2014.960800 · Cited by 70
Göktaş, Y., & Demirel, T. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.004 · Cited by 69
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Hong, H., & Tsai, C. (2014) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/1359866x.2014.941280 · Cited by 81
Understanding university faculty perceptions about innovation in teaching and technology
Kopcha, T. J., Rieber, L. P., & Walker, B. (2015) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12361 · Cited by 68
Li, M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12890-x · Cited by 110
Generative AI as game changer: Implications for language education
Chapelle, C. A. (2025) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103672 · Cited by 96
Science Teachers’ Proficiency Levels and Patterns of TPACK in a Practical Context
Yeh, Y., Lin, T., Hsu, Y., Wu, H.-K., & Hwang, F.-K. (2014) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9523-7 · Cited by 68
Exploring Preschool Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Educational Games
Hsu, C.-Y., Liang, J., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. (2013) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.49.4.c · Cited by 71
Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2008) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2008.10782521 · Cited by 78
A process-oriented framework for acquiring online teaching competencies
Abdous, M. (2010) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-010-9040-5 · Cited by 68
Nanclares, N. H., & Muñoz, A. J. J. (2015) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2015.1125847 · Cited by 68
Bustamante, C. (2017) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689817712119 · Cited by 68
Shadiev, R., Wu, T., & Huang, Y. (2020) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344020000038 · Cited by 68
Fütterer, T., Scherer, R., Scheiter, K., Stürmer, K., & Lachner, A. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104756 · Cited by 70
Classroom-based professional expertise: a mathematics teacher’s practice with technology
Bozkurt, G., & Ruthven, K. (2016) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-016-9732-5 · Cited by 67
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-444-3_1 · Cited by 67
Metodologias ativas e tecnologias digitais na educação médica: novos desafios em tempos de pandemia
da Silva, D. S. M., Sé, E. V. G., Lima, V. V., Borim, F. S. A., de Oliveira, M. S., & Padilha, R. D. Q. (2022) · Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica · doi:10.1590/1981-5271v46.2-20210018 · Cited by 67
Calavia, M. B., Blanco, T., Casas, R., & Gracia, B. D. (2022) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101199 · Cited by 98
Zeng, Y., Wang, Y., & Li, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1091017 · Cited by 67
Digital competence in early childhood education: A systematic review
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11972-6 · Cited by 67
Ayanwale, M. A., Adelana, O. P., & Odufuwa, T. T. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00092-z · Cited by 90
Making mathematics and science integration happen: key aspects of practice
Ríordáin, M. N., Johnston, J., & Walshe, G. (2015) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2015.1078001 · Cited by 78
Teaching and learning activities in Chilean classrooms: Is ICT making a difference?
Hinostroza, J. E., Labbé, C., Brun, M., & Matamala, C. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.019 · Cited by 67
Flexibly Adaptive Professional Development in Support of Teaching Science with Geospatial Technology
Trautmann, N. M., & MaKinster, J. G. (2009) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9181-4 · Cited by 70
TPACK Competencies and Technology Integration Self-Efficacy Perceptions of Pre-Service Teachers
Keser, H., Yılmaz, F. G. K., & Yılmaz, R. (2015) · İlköğretim Online · doi:10.17051/io.2015.65067 · Cited by 67
Validation of the Diagnostic Teacher Assessment of Mathematics and Science (DTAMS) Instrument.
Saderholm, J., Ronau, R. N., Brown, E., & Collins, G. (2010) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00021.x · Cited by 63
A Critical Literature Review of Perceptions of Tablets for Learning in Primary and Secondary Schools
Mulet, J., Leemput, C. V. D., & Amadieu, F. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09478-0 · Cited by 79
Foregrounding Technoethics: Toward Critical Perspectives in Technology and Teacher Education
Krutka, D. G., Heath, M. K., & Willet, K. B. S. (2019) · The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education · doi:10.70725/560948mgghtd · Cited by 66
Ruthven, K. (2013) · Mathematics education in the digital era · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4638-1_16 · Cited by 66
Task design for telecollaborative exchanges: In search of new criteria
Kurek, M., & Müller–Hartmann, A. (2017) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.12.004 · Cited by 76
Building teacher competency for digital content evaluation
Kim, M. K., Xie, K., & Cheng, S. (2017) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.006 · Cited by 102
AMOEBA: Designing for collaboration in computer science classrooms through live learning analytics
Berland, M., Davis, D., & Smith, C. P. (2015) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9217-z · Cited by 67
Teaching Teachers for the Future (TTF) Project TPACK Survey: Summary of the Key Findings
Finger, G., Jamieson-Proctor, R., Cavanagh, R. F., Albion, P., Grimbeek, P. M., Bond, T. G., Fitzgerald, R., Romeo, G., & Lloyd, M. (2013) · Cited by 65
Eine Skala zur Selbsteinschätzung digitaler Kompetenzen bei Lehramtsstudierenden
Rubach, C., & Lazarides, R. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung · doi:10.1007/s35834-019-00248-0 · Cited by 65
Wilson, J., Huang, Y., Palermo, C., Beard, G., & MacArthur, C. A. (2021) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-020-00236-w · Cited by 71
Li, S., Liu, Y., & Su, Y.-S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14127176 · Cited by 117
Technology integration coursework and finding meaning in pre-service teachers’ reflective practice
Kimmons, R. M., Miller, B. G., Amador, J. M., Desjardins, C. D., & Hall, C. S. (2015) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9394-5 · Cited by 85
Brush, T. A., & Saye, J. W. (2009) · Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education · Cited by 65
Tabach, M. (2011) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-011-9186-x · Cited by 65
Wong, L. H., Chai, C. S., Zhang, X., & King, R. B. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2014.2354038 · Cited by 77
A SHORT REVIEW of TPACK for TEACHER EDUCATION
Hulya, G., & en, K. A. (2015) · Educational Research and Reviews · doi:10.5897/err2014.1982 · Cited by 65
Design Thinking Gives STEAM to Teaching: A Framework That Breaks Disciplinary Boundaries
Henriksen, D., Mehta, R., & Mehta, S. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_4 · Cited by 91
Suoranta, J., Teräs, M., Teräs, H., Jandrić, P., Ledger, S., Macgilchrist, F., & Prinsloo, P. (2021) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-021-00260-6 · Cited by 93
Systematic review of quantitative research on digital competences of in-service school teachers
Claro, M., Castro-Grau, C., Ochoa, J. M., Hinostroza, J. E., & Cabello, P. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105030 · Cited by 131
Blau, I., Peled, Y., & Nusan, A. (2014) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2014.978792 · Cited by 64
Cavanagh, R. F., & Koehler, M. J. (2013) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2013.10782616 · Cited by 64
Self-citationTechnological pedagogical content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers
Handal, B., Campbell, C., Cavanagh, M., Petocz, P., & Kelly, N. (2013) · University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) · Cited by 64
Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Multiple Representations in Technology-Rich Environments
Özmantar, M. F., Akkoç, H., Bingölbali, E., Demir, S., & Ergene, B. (2010) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.12973/ejmste/75224 · Cited by 67
Using TPACK to develop digital pedagogues: a higher education experience
Maor, D. (2016) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-016-0055-4 · Cited by 64
Sun, Y., Ströbel, J., & Newby, T. J. (2016) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9486-x · Cited by 78
Maltese primary teachers’ digital competence: implications for continuing professional development
Spiteri, M., & Rundgren, S.-N. C. (2017) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2017.1342242 · Cited by 64
Computer Science Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Yadav, A. K., & Berges, M. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3303770 · Cited by 74
TPACK and Web 2.0: Transformation of Teaching and Learning
Nelson, J., Christopher, A., & Mims, C. (2009) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-009-0329-z · Cited by 64
Exploring relationships among TPACK constructs and ICT achievement among trainee teachers
Khine, M. S., Ali, N., & Afari, E. (2016) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-016-9507-8 · Cited by 63
The TAWOCK conceptual model at content knowledge for professional teaching in vocational education
Arifin, Z., Nurtanto, M., Warju, W., Rabiman, R., & Kholifah, N. (2020) · International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · doi:10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20561 · Cited by 63
Çebi, A., Özdemir, T. B., Reisoğlu, İ., & Çolak, C. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101965 · Cited by 90
Yang, W., Luo, H., & Su, J. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13266 · Cited by 74
Tiede, J., Grafe, S., & Hobbs, R. (2015) · Peabody Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/0161956x.2015.1068083 · Cited by 63
Chen, Y., & Jang, S. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.011 · Cited by 63
Theorising knowledge practices: a missing piece of the educational technology puzzle
Howard, S. K., & Maton, K. (2011) · Research in Learning Technology · doi:10.3402/rlt.v19i3.17109 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1017-1054
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W2123184471
- Cited by
- 12,604
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1812 · 2025: 1418 · 2024: 1168 · 2023: 1182 · 2022: 975 · 2021: 874 · 2020: 715 · 2019: 644 · 2018: 605 · 2017: 509 · 2016: 515 · 2015: 571 · 2014: 395 · 2013: 394 · 2012: 262
- FWCI
- 299.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- technological pedagogical content knowledge, TPCK, pedagogical content knowledge, teacher knowledge, technology integration in teaching, teacher professional development, faculty development, higher education, situated knowledge, conceptual framework, educational technology theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review